THE SENATE |
S.B. NO. |
1263 |
THIRTY-THIRD LEGISLATURE, 2025 |
|
|
STATE OF HAWAII |
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
A BILL FOR AN ACT
relating to historic preservation.
BE IT ENACTED BY THE LEGISLATURE OF THE STATE OF HAWAII:
SECTION 1.
The legislature finds that it is critically important to preserve Hawaii's
cultural resources, including historic properties and burial sites, as integral
elements of the State's heritage. The
legislature also recognizes the pressing need to expedite housing development,
particularly in transit-oriented development areas, to address the housing
crisis and create more housing opportunities in close proximity to transportation.
Accordingly, the purpose of this Act is to:
(1) Create a process for expediting the review of residential transit-oriented development on certain parcels within county-designated transit oriented development zones that have a low risk of affecting historically significant resources;
(2) Further empower lead agencies, including county governments, to make determinations on the potential effects of a project;
(3) Create a ninety-day limit to concur or not concur with project effect determinations; and
(4) Ensure that projects with written concurrence are exempt from further review unless there is a significant change to the project.
SECTION 2. Section 6E-8, Hawaii Revised Statutes, is amended by amending subsection (a) to read as follows:
"(a) Before
any agency or officer of the State or its political subdivisions commences any
project [which] that may affect historic property, an aviation
artifact, or a burial site, the lead agency [or officer] shall [advise
the department] render a determination on the potential effect of the
project and allow the department an opportunity for review of the effect of
the proposed project on historic properties, aviation artifacts, or burial
sites, consistent with section 6E-43, especially those listed on the Hawaii
register of historic places. The
proposed project shall not be commenced, or if it has already begun, continued,
until the department has [given its written concurrence.] been
afforded the opportunity to review the project in compliance with this
subsection. If:
(1) The proposed project consists of corridors or large land areas;
(2) Access to properties is restricted; or
(3) Circumstances dictate that construction be done in stages,
the department may give its written concurrence based on a phased review of the project; provided that there shall be a programmatic agreement between the department and the project applicant that identifies each phase and the estimated timelines for each phase.
The
department shall provide written concurrence or non-concurrence within ninety
days after the filing of a request with the department. [The] If the department fails to
provide written concurrence or non-concurrence with a project effect
determination within ninety days, the project may move to the next step in the
compliance process.
The
agency or officer seeking to proceed with the project, or any person, may
appeal the department's concurrence or non-concurrence to the Hawaii historic
places review board. An agency, officer,
or other person who is dissatisfied with the decision of the review board may
apply to the governor, who may take action as the governor deems best in
overruling or sustaining the department.
Once the department has provided written concurrence on the project effect determination and any necessary mitigation measures have been identified and agreed upon for a proposed project, the appropriate agency or officer of the State or any of its political subdivisions may commence the project, and the project shall be exempt from further review by the department unless there is a significant change to the project's scope of work or project area or unless additional historic properties, aviation artifacts, or burial sites are identified within the project area."
SECTION 3. Section 6E-10, Hawaii Revised Statutes, is amended by amending subsection (a) to read as follows:
"(a) Before any
construction, alteration, disposition or improvement of any nature, by, for, or
permitted by a private landowner may be commenced [which] that
will affect an historic property on the Hawaii register of historic places, the
landowner shall notify the department of the construction, alteration,
disposition, or improvement of any nature and allow the department opportunity
for review of the effect of the proposed construction, alteration, disposition,
or improvement of any nature on the historic property. The proposed construction, alteration,
disposition, or improvement of any nature shall not be commenced, or in the
event it has already begun, continue, until the department shall have given its
concurrence or ninety days have elapsed.
Within ninety days after notification, the department shall:
(1) Commence condemnation proceedings for the purchase of the historic property if the department and property owner do not agree upon an appropriate course of action;
(2) Permit the owner to proceed with the owner's construction, alteration, or improvement; or
(3) In coordination with the owner, undertake or permit the investigation, recording, preservation, and salvage of any historical information deemed necessary to preserve Hawaiian history, by any qualified agency for this purpose.
Once the department has provided
written concurrence on the project effect determination and any necessary
mitigation measures have been identified and agreed upon for a proposed
project, the property owner may commence the project, and the project shall be
exempt from further review by the department unless there is a significant
change to the project's scope of work or project area or unless additional
historic properties, aviation artifacts, or burial sites are identified within
the project area."
SECTION 4. Section 6E-42, Hawaii Revised Statutes, is amended to read as follows:
"§6E-42 Review of proposed projects. (a) Except as provided in section 6E-42.2, before any agency or officer of the State or its political subdivisions approves any project involving a permit, license, certificate, land use change, subdivision, or other entitlement for use, which may affect historic property, aviation artifacts, or a burial site, the agency or office shall advise the department and prior to any approval allow the department an opportunity for review and comment on the effect of the proposed project on historic properties, aviation artifacts, or burial sites, consistent with section 6E-43, including those listed in the Hawaii register of historic places. If:
(1) The proposed project consists of corridors or large land areas;
(2) Access to properties is restricted; or
(3) Circumstances dictate that construction be done in stages,
the department's review and comment may be based on a phased review of the project; provided that there shall be a programmatic agreement between the department and the project applicant that identifies each phase and the estimated timelines for each phase.
Once the department has provided
written concurrence on the project effect determination and any necessary
mitigation measures have been identified and agreed upon for a proposed
project, the appropriate agency or officer of the State or any of its political
subdivisions may commence the project, and the project shall be exempt from
further review by the department unless there is a significant change to the
project's scope of work or project area or unless additional historic
properties, aviation artifacts, or burial sites are identified within the
project area.
(b)
The department shall inform the public of any project proposals
submitted to it under this section that are not otherwise subject to the
requirement of a public hearing or other public notification.
(c)
Counties deriving and expending revenues on mass transit stations
pursuant to section 46-16.8 may request programmatic review by the department
for residential transit-oriented development where a permit, license,
certificate, land use change, subdivision, or other entitlement may be
required.
(d)
No later than January 1, 2026, the counties shall work with the
department to identify and provide to the department specific parcels in
proximity to mass transit stations where residential transit-oriented
development is specifically consistent with a comprehensive general plan
adopted pursuant to section 46-4; provided that:
(1) The counties shall
first consult with the department and agree through memorandum on the mass
transit stations, and specific transit-oriented development parcels, scoping
the potential area for initiating programmatic review; and
(2) The counties shall
then solicit requests and consent from non-county landowners to have their
parcels within the scoped area of the memorandum initiating programmatic review
to proceed with the programmatic review process.
(e)
The department shall review all parcels submitted by the counties
pursuant to the scoping memorandum and classify each parcel, within six months
of submittal, according to the risk that residential transit-oriented
development may pose to historic properties into three categories in order of
potential effect level from high to low in the categories of architecture,
archaeology, and history and culture; provided that:
(1) All county and
non-county parcels for programmatic review shall include the county's
assessment of whether development on each parcel may affect historic property,
aviation artifacts, or a burial site; and
(2) This assessment
is based on:
(A) The
Hawaii or national register of historic places;
(B) The
age of above-surface structures;
(C) Any
existing archaeological inventory surveys previously accepted by the
department;
(D) Any
burial treatment plans accepted by the department;
(E) The
type of substrate known to typically contain burials; and
(F) Any
other literary review relevant to the area.
(f)
The department shall work with the county that made the submittal to
develop and agree on permitting memoranda within three months of classification
regarding development best practices, including continued identification,
addressing levels of risk for the lower two effect levels in each of the
categories, including but not limited to creating photo inventories and the
presence of onsite archaeological monitoring, and consider these best practices
as standardized for activities conducted under this section.
A county shall incorporate by reference
these best practices as conditions of approval for any project involving a
permit, license, certificate, land use change, subdivision, or other
entitlement for use.
(g)
Parcels identified by the department where all categories are rated in the
lower two effect levels shall be considered to comply with subsection (a) or
section 6E-8 regarding state or county lands or projects, and any subsequent
permit, license, certificate, land use change, subdivision, or other
entitlement for use shall not require referral to the department; provided that:
(1) The project is
only residential transit-oriented;
(2) The project has
reached substantial construction by June 30, 2036; and
(3) Development
activities have commenced consistent with best practices to address the applicable
level of risk.
(h)
Any parcels characterized as highest risk shall require referral to the
department pursuant to subsection (a).
(i)
Section 6E-43.6 shall apply in the event of an inadvertent discovery of a
burial site.
(j)
The Hawaii housing finance and development corporation may submit to the
department any additional parcels for programmatic review if the counties do not
provide a submittal pursuant to subsection (d); provided that the same analysis
shall be conducted pursuant to subsection (e), and the department shall
classify the submittal within six months of receipt.
(k)
The Hawaii community development authority may submit parcels within its
jurisdiction to the department for review, and any parcels identified by the
department for which all categories are rated in the lower two effect levels shall
be considered to comply with subsection (a) or section 6E-8 regarding state or
county lands or projects, and any subsequent permit, license, certificate, land
use change, subdivision, or other entitlement for use shall not require
referral to the department; provided that:
(1) The project is
only residential transit-oriented;
(2) The project has
reached substantial construction by June 30, 2036;
(3) Development
activities have commenced consistent with best practices to address the
applicable level of risk; and
(4) The department
shall classify the submittal within six months of receipt.
[(c)] (l) The department shall adopt rules in
accordance with chapter 91 to implement this section."
SECTION 5. This Act does not affect rights and duties that matured, penalties that were incurred, and proceedings that were begun before its effective date.
SECTION 6. Statutory material to be repealed is bracketed and stricken. New statutory material is underscored.
SECTION 7. This Act shall take effect on July 1, 2025.
INTRODUCED BY: |
_____________________________ |
|
|
Report Title:
Historic Preservation; County-designated Transit-oriented Development; SHPD Review; Historic Property
Description:
Creates a process for expediting the review of residential transit-oriented development on certain parcels within county-designated transit oriented development zones that have a low risk of affecting historically significant resources. Authorizes lead agencies, including county governments, to make determinations on the potential effects of a project. Creates a ninety-day limit to concur or not concur with project effect determinations. Provides that projects with written concurrence are exempt from further review unless there is a significant change to the project or additional historic properties, aviation artifacts, or burial sites are identified within the project area.
The summary description
of legislation appearing on this page is for informational purposes only and is
not legislation or evidence of legislative intent.