STAND. COM. REP. NO.  1724

 

Honolulu, Hawaii

                , 2025

 

RE:   S.B. No. 691

      S.D. 1

      H.D. 1

 

 

 

 

Honorable Nadine K. Nakamura

Speaker, House of Representatives

Thirty-Third State Legislature

Regular Session of 2025

State of Hawaii

 

Madame:

 

     Your Committee on Judiciary & Hawaiian Affairs, to which was referred S.B. No. 691, S.D. 1, entitled:

 

"A BILL FOR AN ACT RELATING TO FAMILY COURTS,"

 

begs leave to report as follows:

 

     The purpose of this measure is to establish a minimum age of twelve before a child may be adjudicated for any alleged or attempted violation of law.

 

     Your Committee received testimony in support of this measure from the Office of the Public Defender; Human Rights for Kids; National Youth Justice Network; and one individual.  Your Committee received testimony in opposition to this measure from Department of the Prosecuting Attorney of the City and County of Honolulu.  Your Committee received comments on this measure from the Department of the Attorney General.

 

     Your Committee finds the United States remains the only country without a fully established minimum age for juvenile delinquency adjudication, placing young children at risk of involvement in the criminal justice system despite their limited cognitive development and understanding of legal proceedings.  Research indicates that children under the age of twelve lack the intellectual maturity to form criminal intent, but still require appropriate services and interventions when engaging in harmful behavior.  This measure would ensure that such young children are not subjected to legal proceedings.

 

     Your Committee has amended this measure by:

 

     (1)  Limiting the scope of the petition alleging violation of attempted violation of any federal, state, or local law or county ordinance so that the Family Court retains the ability to exercise jurisdiction over children with issues of school nonattendance or behavioral concerns; and

 

     (2)  Making technical, nonsubstantive amendments for the purposes of clarity, consistency, and style.

 

     As affirmed by the record of votes of the members of your Committee on Judiciary & Hawaiian Affairs that is attached to this report, your Committee is in accord with the intent and purpose of S.B. No. 691, S.D. 1, as amended herein, and recommends that it pass Second Reading in the form attached hereto as S.B. No. 691, S.D. 1, H.D. 1, and be placed on the calendar for Third Reading.

 

Respectfully submitted on behalf of the members of the Committee on Judiciary & Hawaiian Affairs,

 

 

 

 

____________________________

DAVID A. TARNAS, Chair