STAND. COM. REP. NO. 636

 

Honolulu, Hawaii

                  

 

RE:    S.B. No. 169

       S.D. 1

 

 

 

Honorable Ronald D. Kouchi

President of the Senate

Thirty-Third State Legislature

Regular Session of 2025

State of Hawaii

 

Sir:

 

     Your Committee on Judiciary, to which was referred S.B. No. 169 entitled:

 

"A BILL FOR AN ACT RELATING TO REDRESS FOR WRONGFUL CONVICTION AND IMPRISONMENT,"

 

begs leave to report as follows:

 

     The purpose and intent of this measure is to make improvements to the State's wrongful imprisonment compensation law.

 

     Your Committee received testimony in support of this measure from the Office of the Public Defender and one individual.

 

     Your Committee received testimony in opposition to this measure from one individual.

 

     Prior to the hearing on this measure, your Committee posted and made available for public review a proposed S.D. 1, which amends this measure by:

 

     (1)  Deeming a petition for relief filed under chapter 661B, Hawaii Revised Statutes, that meets certain conditions to be presumptively valid;

 

     (2)  Establishing a procedure upon reversal of or vacating of a conviction under chapter 661B, Hawaii Revised Statutes;

 

     (3)  Allowing a petitioner who receives advance compensation for a claim filed under section 661B-2, Hawaii Revised Statutes, to keep any funds already disbursed if the petition is subsequently denied; and

 

     (4)  Making technical, nonsubstantive amendments for the purposes of clarity and consistency.

 

     Your Committee received testimony in support of the proposed S.D. 1 from the Hawaiʻi Innocence Project and Community Alliance on Prisons. 

 

     Your Committee received testimony in opposition to the proposed S.D. 1 from the Department of the Attorney General.

 

     Your Committee finds that innocent persons who have been wrongly convicted of crimes and subsequently imprisoned have been uniquely victimized by the State and deserve an avenue of redress that is fair, timely, and certain.  Your Committee also finds that no claims have been paid by the State to wrongfully convicted persons in the eight years since the enactment of Act 156, Session Laws of Hawaii 2016.  It is thus the goal of this measure to make improvements to the State's wrongful imprisonment compensation law.

 

     Your Committee notes that claims for compensation for wrongful conviction and imprisonment are a potential liability for the State.  Instead of letting these claims languish for years, your Committee believes that these claims should be addressed and paid in a timely manner, thereby giving certainty to the budgeting process.

 

     Your Committee has amended this measure by retaining the original version of this measure but:

 

     (1)  Specifying that the Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation is required to provide the notice to the person of the ability to file a claim under chapter 661B, Hawaii Revised Statutes (HRS), and requiring that the notice:

 

          (A)  Contain the filing deadline; and

 

          (B)  Include copies of the statutory sections related to the filing requirements and a copy of the person's order or pardon;

 

     (2)  Changing the requirement for relief under chapter 661B, HRS, to require that the petitioner's conviction was reversed or vacated or the petitioner was pardoned on grounds consistent with innocence, rather than actual innocence;

 

     (3)  Establishing a procedure upon reversal of or vacating of a conviction under chapter 661B, HRS, that requires the court to make certain findings regarding the petitioner's eligibility for relief;

 

     (4)  Clarifying that the court providing notice of a petitioner's deemed petition for relief to the appropriate county prosecutor and the Attorney General satisfies service requirements;

 

     (5)  Specifying that the court must provide an order to the Comptroller to commence advance compensation payments;

 

     (6)  Clarifying that, when a petition is deemed admitted by the Attorney General, the court is required to award compensation pursuant to section 661B-3, HRS, minus any advance payment made to the petitioner;

 

     (7)  Clarifying that a person whose conviction was reversed or vacated with prejudice is deemed innocent and entitled to compensation under chapter 661B, HRS, minus any advance payment to the petitioner;

 

     (8)  Specifying that the Comptroller must issue a warrant on the first of each month for a payment of $5,000 to the petitioner until the State has paid in aggregate an amount equal to a payment of one year of imprisonment;

 

     (9)  Specifying that advance payments to a petitioner under chapter 661B, HRS, must cease if the Attorney General or county prosecuting attorney files new charges against the petitioner based on the same alleged act or acts for the petitioner's original conviction;

 

    (10)  Allowing a petitioner who receives advance compensation for a claim filed under section 661B-2, HRS, to keep any funds already disbursed if the petition is subsequently denied;

 

    (11)  Shifting the burden of proof from the petitioner to the State and requiring the State to prove by a preponderance of the evidence that the reversal or vacating of the conviction for a petitioner, or the pardoning of the petitioner, was inconsistent with innocence;

 

    (12)  Making confirming amendments;

 

    (13)  Inserting additional legislative findings; and

 

    (14)  Making technical, nonsubstantive amendments for the purposes of clarity and consistency.

 

     As affirmed by the record of votes of the members of your Committee on Judiciary that is attached to this report, your Committee is in accord with the intent and purpose of S.B. No. 169, as amended herein, and recommends that it pass Second Reading in the form attached hereto as S.B. No. 169, S.D. 1, and be referred to your Committee on Ways and Means.

 

Respectfully submitted on behalf of the members of the Committee on Judiciary,

 

 

 

________________________________

KARL RHOADS, Chair