STAND. COM. REP. NO. 1093
Honolulu, Hawaii
RE: H.B. No. 395
H.D. 1
S.D. 1
Honorable Ronald D. Kouchi
President of the Senate
Thirty-Third State Legislature
Regular Session of 2025
State of Hawaii
Sir:
Your Committee on Judiciary, to which was referred H.B. No. 395, H.D. 1, entitled:
"A BILL FOR AN ACT RELATING TO JURY DUTY,"
begs leave to report as follows:
The purpose and intent of this measure is to increase the amount each juror or prospective juror is paid for each day of actual attendance at court.
Your Committee received testimony in support of this measure from the Judiciary, Office of the Public Defender, Hawaii State Bar Association, and one individual.
Your Committee finds that juror compensation was last increased in 1989 from $20 to $30 per day. Since then, the cost of living in the State has drastically increased. Your Committee further finds that, by comparison, jurors who serve in the United States District Court receive $50 per day, with the National Center for State Courts recommending that, at the very least, state courts should review compensation rates in relation to the prevailing federal rate. Your Committee believes that raising the daily rate will provide some relief for those who serve in this important civic duty. This measure will show the State's appreciation and acknowledgement for the sacrifice the State's citizenry makes to serve on a jury.
Your
Committee has amended this measure by:
(1) Changing
the increased amount a juror shall be paid for each day of actual attendance at
court to an unspecified amount; and
(2) Inserting an effective date of April 23, 2057,
to encourage further
discussion.
Your Committee notes
that this measure, as amended, contains an unspecified increase in the amount
each juror or prospective juror is paid for each day of actual attendance at
court. Should your Committee on Ways and
Means choose to deliberate on this measure, your Committee respectfully
requests that it consider inserting an increased amount paid to each juror or
prospective juror of $75 for each day of actual attendance at court. Accounting for inflation, the current rate of
$30 that was set in 1989 adjusts to $75, not the $50 rate as initially proposed
by this measure.
As affirmed by the record of votes of the members of your Committee on Judiciary that is attached to this report, your Committee is in accord with the intent and purpose of H.B. No. 395, H.D. 1, as amended herein, and recommends that it pass Second Reading in the form attached hereto as H.B. No. 395, H.D. 1, S.D. 1, and be referred to your Committee on Ways and Means.
Respectfully submitted on behalf of the members of the Committee on Judiciary,
|
|
________________________________ KARL RHOADS, Chair |
|
|
|