STAND.
COM. REP. NO. 668
Honolulu, Hawaii
, 2025
RE: H.B. No. 383
H.D. 1
Honorable Nadine K. Nakamura
Speaker, House of Representatives
Thirty-Third State Legislature
Regular Session of 2025
State of Hawaii
Madame:
Your Committee on Human Services & Homelessness, to which was referred H.B. No. 383 entitled:
"A BILL FOR AN ACT RELATING TO ORDERS FOR PROTECTION,"
begs leave to report as follows:
The purpose of this measure is to:
(1) Reinstate
mandatory minimum jail sentences for successive violations of the same order
for protection;
(2) Remove the distinction between domestic and
non-domestic violations of an order for protection; and
(3) Eliminate the court's ability to suspend mandatory minimum sentences.
Your Committee received testimony in support of this measure from the Honolulu Police Department; County of Hawai‘i, Office of the Prosecuting Attorney; Department of the Prosecuting Attorney for the City and County of Honolulu; Hawai‘i State Coalition Against Domestic Violence; Domestic Violence Action Center; and two individuals. Your Committee received testimony in opposition to this measure from the Office of the Public Defender.
Your Committee finds that protective orders
are essential tools in preventing further harm to individuals facing threats or
violence. However, repeated violations of
these orders demonstrate a pattern of disregard for the consequences of the
violation and an escalation on behalf of the abusive partner, which highlights
the need for stronger enforcement measures. Currently, inconsistencies in sentencing for
violations of temporary restraining orders and protective orders undermine
their effectiveness, allowing abusers to disregard court mandates with minimal
consequences. This measure ensures that
all court-issued protections carry the same level of accountability and
reinforces the seriousness of protective orders, deterring future violations
and providing victims with greater assurance of safety.
Your Committee has amended this measure by:
(1) Clarifying that a conviction of a temporary restraining order issued under the same judicial case number as the order for protection shall be treated as a second or subsequent violation of an order for protection;
(2) Reinstating statutory language that authorizes the court to suspend mandatory minimum sentences under certain conditions;
(3) Changing the effective date to July 1, 3000, to encourage further discussion; and
(4) Making technical, nonsubstantive amendments for the purposes of clarity, consistency, and style.
As affirmed by the record of votes of the members of your Committee on Human Services & Homelessness that is attached to this report, your Committee is in accord with the intent and purpose of H.B. No. 383, as amended herein, and recommends that it pass Second Reading in the form attached hereto as H.B. No. 383, H.D. 1, and be referred to your Committee on Judiciary & Hawaiian Affairs.
Respectfully submitted on behalf of the members of the Committee on Human Services & Homelessness,
|
|
____________________________ LISA MARTEN, Chair |
|
|
|