HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES |
H.B. NO. |
250 |
THIRTY-THIRD LEGISLATURE, 2025 |
H.D. 2 |
|
STATE OF HAWAII |
S.D. 1 |
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
A BILL FOR AN ACT
RELATING TO HEALTH.
BE IT ENACTED BY THE LEGISLATURE OF THE STATE OF HAWAII:
SECTION 1. The legislature finds that prior authorization is a health plan cost-control process that requires physicians, health care professionals, and hospitals to obtain advance approval from a health plan before a specific service to a patient is qualified for payment or coverage. Each health plan has its own policies and procedures that health care providers are required to navigate to have services they prescribe for their patients approved for payment before being provided to the patient. Each health plan uses its own standards and methods, the individual judgment of an employed medical director, or advice from a contracted firm for determining the medical necessity of the services prescribed, which are not transparent or clear to the prescribing clinician or health care provider.
The legislature further finds that there is emerging consensus among health care providers that prior authorization increases administrative burdens and costs. In the 2023 physician workforce report published by the university of Hawaii John A. Burns school of medicine, physicians voted prior authorization as their top concern regarding administrative burden. Furthermore, a physician survey conducted by the American Medical Association reported that ninety-five per cent of physicians attribute prior authorization to somewhat or significantly increased physician burnout, and that more than one-in-three physicians have staff who work exclusively on prior authorization. The survey also found that:
(1) Eighty-three per cent of prior authorization denials were subsequently overturned by health plans;
(2) Ninety-four per cent of respondents said that the prior authorization process always, often, or sometimes delays care;
(3) Nineteen per cent of respondents said prior authorization resulted in a serious adverse event leading to a patient being hospitalized;
(4) Thirteen per cent of respondents said prior authorization resulted in a serious adverse event leading to a life-threatening event or requiring intervention to prevent permanent impairment or damage; and
(5) Seven per cent of respondents said prior authorization resulted in a serious adverse event leading to a patient's disability, permanent body damage, congenital anomaly, birth defect, or death.
The legislature believes that reducing the burdens of prior authorization will assist health care providers, thereby ensuring the health and safety of their patients.
Accordingly, the purpose of this Act is to:
(1) Examine prior authorization practices in the State by requiring utilization review entities to report certain data to the state health planning and development agency; and
(2) Establish the health care appropriateness and necessity working group to make recommendations to improve and expedite the prior authorization process.
SECTION 2. Chapter 323D, Hawaii Revised Statutes, is amended by adding two new sections to part II to be appropriately designated and to read as follows:
"§323D- Prior
authorization; reporting. (a)
Utilization review entities doing business in the State shall submit
data to the state agency relating to prior authorization of health care
services, in a format specified by the state agency. Reporting shall be annual for the preceding
calendar year and shall be submitted no later than January 31 of the subsequent
calendar year. The state agency shall
post the reporting format on its website no later than three months before
the start of the reporting period.
(1) The individual to whom the information
relates authorizes the disclosure; or
(2) Authorization is not required pursuant to title
45 Code of Federal Regulations section 164.512.
(c) The state agency shall compile the data by provider
of health insurance, health care setting, and line of business,
and shall post a report of findings, including recommendations, on its website
no later than March 1 of the year after the reporting period. If the state agency is unable to post the
report of findings by March 1, the state agency shall notify the legislature in
writing within ten days and include an estimated date of posting, reasons for
the delay, and if applicable, a corrective action plan.
§323D- Health care appropriateness and necessity
working group; established. (a) There is established the health care
appropriateness and necessity working group within the state agency. The working group shall:
(1) Determine by
research and consensus:
(A) The
most respected peer-reviewed national scientific standards;
(B) Clinical
guidelines; and
(C) Appropriate
use criteria published by federal agencies, academic institutions, and
professional societies,
that correspond to each of
the most frequent clinical treatments, procedures, medications, diagnostic
images, laboratory and diagnostic tests, or types of medical equipment
prescribed by licensed physicians and other health care providers in the State
that trigger prior authorization determinations by the utilization review
entities;
(2) Assess whether it is appropriate to require
prior authorization for each considered clinical treatment, procedure,
medication, diagnostic image, or type of medical equipment prescribed by
licensed physicians and other health care providers;
(3) Make recommendations on standards for third
party reviewers related to the specialty expertise of those reviewing and for
those discussing a patient's denial with the patient's health care provider;
(4) Recommend appropriate time frames within which urgent and standard requests
shall be decided;
(5) Monitor anticipated federal developments related to prior authorization
for health care services and consider these in making its recommendations; and
(6) Assess industry progress towards, and readiness to implement, any
recommendations.
(b) The administrator of the state agency shall
invite the following to be members of the working group:
(1) Five members representing
the insurance industry, to be selected by the Hawaii Association of Health
Plans;
(2) Five members
representing licensed health care professionals, two of whom shall be selected
by the Hawaii Medical Association, two of whom shall be selected by the Healthcare
Association of Hawaii, and one of whom shall be selected by the center for
nursing; and
(3) Five members
representing consumers of health care or employers, two of whom shall be selected
by the board of trustees of the employer-union health benefits trust fund, one
of whom shall be a consumer selected by the statewide health coordinating
council, one of whom shall be selected by the Hawaii Primary Care Association, and
one of whom shall be selected by Papa Ola Lokahi.
The members of the working group
shall elect a chairperson and vice chairperson from amongst themselves. The director of health, insurance
commissioner, and administrator of the med-QUEST division of the department of
human services shall each appoint an ex-officio advisor for the working group.
(c) The working group shall submit a report of
its findings and recommendations regarding information under subsection (a),
including any proposed legislation, to the legislature no later than twenty
days prior to the convening of each regular session.
(d)
The recommendations of the working group shall be advisory
only and not mandatory for health care facilities, health care professionals,
insurers, and utilization review entities.
The state agency shall promote the recommendations among health care facilities,
health care professionals, insurers, and utilization review entities and shall
publish annually in its report to the legislature the extent and impacts of its
use in the State.
(e) The state agency shall seek transparency and
agreement among health care facilities, health care professionals, insurers,
utilization review entities, and consumers related to the most respected
clinical, scientific, and efficacious standards, guidelines, and appropriate
use criteria corresponding to medical treatments and services most commonly
triggering prior authorization determinations to reduce uncertainty around
common prior authorization processes, and also foster automation of prior
authorization to the benefit of all. The
state agency shall explore means of achieving statewide health sector agreement
on means of automating prior authorization determinations in the near future."
SECTION 3. Section 323D-2, Hawaii Revised Statutes, is amended by adding six new definitions to be appropriately inserted and to read as follows:
""Enrollee" means
an individual eligible to receive health care benefits from a health insurer in the State
pursuant to a health plan or other health insurance coverage. "Enrollee" includes an enrollee's
legally authorized representative.
"Health care professional" has
the same meaning as defined in section 431:26-101.
"Prior authorization" means the process by which a utilization
review entity determines the medical necessity or medical appropriateness of
otherwise covered health care services before the health care services are
rendered. "Prior
authorization" includes any health insurer's or utilization review entity's
requirement that an insured or a health care facility or health care
professional notify the insurer or utilization review entity before providing
health care services to determine eligibility for payment or coverage.
"Prior authorization data" means data required for compliance with federal law and the
regulations of the federal Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services,
including those promulgated under title 42 Code of Federal Regulations sections
422.122(c), 438.210(f), 440.230(e)(3), and 457.732(c).
"Urgent
health care service" means a health care service which,
without an expedited prior authorization could,
in the opinion of a physician with knowledge of the enrollee's medical
condition:
(1) Seriously jeopardize the life or health
of the enrollee or the ability of the enrollee to regain maximum function; or
(2) Subject the enrollee to severe pain that
cannot be adequately managed without the care or treatment that is the subject
of the utilization review.
"Urgent
health care service" includes mental and behavioral health care services.
"Utilization review entity" means
an individual or entity that performs prior authorization for one or more of the following entities:
(1) An insurer
governed by chapter 431, article 10A; a mutual benefit society governed by
chapter 432, article 1; a fraternal benefit society governed by chapter 432, article
2; or a health maintenance organization governed by chapter 432D; or
(2) Any other individual that provides, offers to provide, or administers hospital, outpatient, medical, prescription drug, or other health benefits to a person treated by a health care facility or health care professional in the State under a policy, contract, plan, or agreement."
SECTION 4. New statutory material is underscored.
SECTION 5. This Act shall take effect on July 1, 3000.
Report Title:
SHPDA; Prior
Authorization; Utilization Review Entities; Reporting; Health Care
Appropriateness and Necessity Working Group; Reports
Description:
Requires utilization review entities to submit data relating to the prior authorization of health care services to the State Health Planning and Development Agency. Establishes the Health Care Appropriateness and Necessity Working Group within the State Health Planning and Development Agency and requires the working group to submit annual reports to the Legislature. Effective 7/1/3000. (SD1)
The summary description
of legislation appearing on this page is for informational purposes only and is
not legislation or evidence of legislative intent.