STAND. COM. REP. NO. 2229

 

Honolulu, Hawaii

                  

 

RE:    S.B. No. 2277

       S.D. 1

 

 

 

Honorable Ronald D. Kouchi

President of the Senate

Thirty-First State Legislature

Regular Session of 2022

State of Hawaii

 

Sir:

 

     Your Committee on Commerce and Consumer Protection, to which was referred S.B. No. 2277 entitled:

 

"A BILL FOR AN ACT RELATING TO CONTRACTOR PRACTICES,"

 

begs leave to report as follows:

 

     The purpose and intent of this measure is to:

 

     (1)  Prohibit a contractor from advertising or promising to pay or rebate a property or casualty insurance deductible, or any portion thereof, to induce an insured property owner to purchase goods or services;

 

     (2)  Allow an insured to rescind a contract with a contractor within five business days after the date the contract is executed;

 

     (3)  Require a contractor to furnish a property owner with a written five-business-day right of rescission form advising the property owner of the legal right to rescind the contract within the allotted time;

 

     (4)  Require a contractor to return funds to an insured homeowner within five business days of receipt of an executed right of rescission notice; and

 

     (5)  Prohibit a contractor from representing or negotiating, or offering or advertising to represent or negotiate, on behalf of an insured or claimant in connection with the repair or reconstruction work associated with any insurance claim.

 

     Your Committee received testimony in support of this measure from the Hawaii Insurers Council, Hawaii Public Adjusters, National Insurance Crime Bureau, American Property Casualty Insurance Association, National Association of Public Adjusters, United Policyholders, and one individual.  Your Committee received testimony in opposition to this measure from the Roofing Contractors Association of Hawaii.  Your Committee received comments on this measure from the Contractors License Board and State Farm Automobile Insurance Company.

 

     Your Committee finds that contractor fraud, particularly involving roofing and roofing-related services, continues to be a widespread problem across the country, including in Hawaii.  After a storm, some unscrupulous contractors use the catastrophe to prey upon already vulnerable consumers by making misrepresentations that the replacement of their roof will be covered by their insurance policy.  If an insured is coerced into signing a contract with a contractor to make extensive repairs that an insurance adjuster later determines were unnecessary or not covered, the consumer remains contractually obligated to pay for repairs they do not need and cannot afford.  This measure joins Hawaii with twenty-two other states that have adopted similar consumer protection laws aimed at limiting the scope in which contractors can engage with homeowners to prevent consumers from being scammed into entering into deceptive repair contracts.

 

     Your Committee has amended this measure by:

 

     (1)  Clarifying that a contractor shall not pay or rebate, or promise to pay or rebate, a policyholder's insurance deductible, or any portion thereof;

 

     (2)  Clarifying that a contractor shall not represent or negotiate, or offer or advertise to represent or negotiate, on behalf of an insured or a claimant, any insurance claim in connection with the repair or reconstruction work associated with the insurance claim;

 

     (3)  Inserting a definition for the term "pay or rebate";

 

     (4)  Clarifying the definition of "promise to pay or rebate";

 

     (5)  Requiring a notice of recission to be made by means of certified mail, return receipt requested;

 

     (6)  Inserting an effective date of July 1, 2022; and

 

     (7)  Making technical, nonsubstantive amendments for the purposes of clarity and consistency.

 

     As affirmed by the record of votes of the members of your Committee on Commerce and Consumer Protection that is attached to this report, your Committee is in accord with the intent and purpose of S.B. No. 2277, as amended herein, and recommends that it pass Second Reading in the form attached hereto as S.B. No. 2277, S.D. 1, and be referred to your Committee on Judiciary.

 

Respectfully submitted on behalf of the members of the Committee on Commerce and Consumer Protection,

 

 

 

________________________________

ROSALYN H. BAKER, Chair