|
THE SENATE |
S.B. NO. |
312 |
|
THIRTY-FIRST LEGISLATURE, 2021 |
S.D. 1 |
|
|
STATE OF HAWAII |
Proposed |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
||
A BILL FOR AN ACT
proposing an amendment to the hawaii constitution regarding the freedom of speech.
BE IT ENACTED BY THE LEGISLATURE OF THE STATE OF HAWAII:
SECTION 1. The legislature finds that the United States Supreme Court's decision in Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission, 558 U.S. 310 (2010), reversed long-standing campaign finance restrictions and designated corporate spending on elections as free speech protected under the First Amendment of the Constitution of the United States. The decision removed any limits on the amount of money that corporations, special interest groups, and political action committees (PACs) could spend on an election. The legislature further finds that the decision in Citizens United is a serious threat to our democracy. Corporations enjoy various advantages, including limited liability, perpetual life, and favorable treatment in the accumulation and distribution of assets, which allow them to amass and spend an extraordinary amount of money on political messages that often have far greater reach and influence than messages from individuals. During the twelve years since the Citizens United decision, there has been a massive increase in political spending by corporations, special interest groups, and PACs, dramatically expanding their already outsized political influence on election outcomes and policy decisions.
The legislature also finds that at least twenty states, including Hawaii in 2016, have passed legislation urging Congress to pass a proposed constitutional amendment that overturns the decision in Citizens United; however, Congress has failed to take any such action and appears unlikely to do so.
The purpose of this Act is to propose a symbolic amendment to article I, section 4, of the Hawaii State Constitution to provide that the expenditure of money to influence elections is not a form of speech protected under the Hawaii State Constitution. The legislature acknowledges that this Act will have no binding effect on the Constitution of the United States, nor will it change the outcomes of the Citizens United decision. However, the power to amend state constitutions rests with the people of each state, and the legislature believes it is critical that the State of Hawaii express its disapproval of the Citizen United decision.
SECTION 2. Article I, section 4, of the Constitution of the State of Hawaii is amended to read as follows:
"FREEDOM OF RELIGION, SPEECH, PRESS,
ASSEMBLY AND PETITION
Section 4. No law shall be enacted respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof, or abridging the freedom of speech or of the press or the right of the people peaceably to assemble and to petition the government for a redress of grievances.
The freedom of speech shall not include the expenditure of money to influence elections."
SECTION 3. The question to be printed on the ballot shall be as follows:
"Shall the Hawaii State Constitution be amended to symbolically state that freedom of speech protections under the Hawaii State Constitution do not include the expenditure of money to influence elections, as a means to express disapproval of the United States Supreme Court's decision in Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission which allows unrestricted spending by corporations on elections?"
SECTION 4. New constitutional material is underscored.
SECTION 5. This amendment shall take effect upon compliance with article XVII, section 3, of the Constitution of the State of Hawaii.
Report Title:
Constitutional Amendment; Freedom of Speech; Monetary Expenditures to Influence Elections
Description:
Proposes a symbolic constitutional amendment to provide that freedom of speech protected under the Hawaii State Constitution does not include the expenditure of money to influence elections. (Proposed SD1)
The summary description of legislation appearing on this page is for informational purposes only and is not legislation or evidence of legislative intent.