HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES |
H.B. NO. |
1509 |
THIRTY-FIRST LEGISLATURE, 2022 |
|
|
STATE OF HAWAII |
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
A BILL FOR AN ACT
relating to LAW ENFORCEMENT.
BE IT ENACTED BY THE LEGISLATURE OF THE STATE OF HAWAII:
SECTION 1. The legislature finds that regulating the use of forcible-entry warrants, often called no-knock warrants, is essential to advancing public safety and police accountability. No-knock raids are searches in which a law enforcement officer or multiple officers forcibly enter a dwelling without knocking or announcing their presence. A 2014 report by the American Civil Liberties Union found that no-knock raids are often used in conjunction with military-grade equipment and weaponry when conducting searches. In March 2020, Breonna Taylor, a twenty-six year old African American medical worker, was killed in her home in Louisville, Kentucky, during a no-knock raid by Louisville Metro Police, which led to a national movement to regulate such warrants.
The legislature further finds that no-knock warrants have also been executed in Hawaii, endangering the well-being of residents. Under section 803-37, Hawaii Revised Statutes, officers of justice are required to declare their office and their business and demand entrance before forcing their way into a dwelling. From various authorities, including article I, section 7, of the Hawaii State Constitution, a requirement has been derived for officers to wait a reasonable period of time prior to forcing entry into a dwelling. Yet, what constitutes a reasonable time is determined by the facts of a case. In State v. Diaz, 100 Hawaii 210, 58 P.3d 1257 (2002), the Hawaii supreme court found that fifteen seconds was a reasonable time to wait prior to entering an interior office door of a commercial establishment that was open for business. More recently, in State v. Naeole, 148 Hawaii 243, 470 P.3d 1120 (2020), the Hawaii supreme court found that more than twenty-five seconds was required when executing a warrant early in the morning at a private residence.
The purpose of this Act is to strengthen public safety by banning the use of no-knock warrants, requiring law enforcement officers to wait at least thirty seconds before forcing their way into a building to execute a warrant unless exigent circumstances exist, and requiring an officer serving a warrant to wear an authorized uniform and activated body-worn video camera.
SECTION 2. Chapter 805, Hawaii Revised Statutes, is amended by adding two new sections to be appropriately designated and to read as follows:
"§805- No-knock
warrants; prohibited. Notwithstanding any provision of law to the
contrary, all warrants shall require the serving officer or officers to declare
the officer's office and business in an audible voice and wait a reasonable time
of at least thirty seconds for compliance before entry into a house, store, or other
building for the purpose of serving the warrant; provided that the thirty seconds
shall commence at the moment the announcement of presence is made by the officer;
provided further that an officer shall not be required to wait if
exigent circumstances exist that cause waiting to be hazardous or otherwise impracticable.
§805- Service of warrant; uniform and body-worn video camera requirement. Any officer serving a warrant issued pursuant to this chapter shall do so while wearing an authorized uniform and activated body-worn video camera or similar device. An officer serving a warrant shall not obscure or conceal the officer's office in the process of serving the warrant."
SECTION 3. Section 803-11, Hawaii Revised Statutes, is amended to read as follows:
"§803-11 Entering house to
arrest. Whenever it is necessary to
enter a house to arrest an offender, and entrance is refused, the officer or
person making the arrest may force an entrance by breaking doors or other
barriers. [But before] Before
breaking any door, the officer or person shall first demand entrance in [a
loud] an audible voice, and state that the officer or person is the
bearer of a warrant of arrest; or if it is in a case in which arrest is lawful
without warrant, the officer or person shall substantially state that
information in an audible voice. No officer
shall enter a house to arrest an offender without audibly declaring the officer's
office and business and waiting a reasonable time of at least thirty seconds for
compliance before entry; provided that the
thirty seconds shall commence at the moment the announcement of presence is made
by the officer; provided further that an officer shall not be required to
wait if exigent circumstances exist that cause waiting to be hazardous or otherwise
impracticable."
SECTION 4. Section 803-37, Hawaii Revised Statutes, is amended to read as follows:
"§803-37 Power of officer
serving. The officer charged with the
warrant, if a house, store, or other building is designated as the place to be
searched, may enter it without demanding permission if the officer finds it
open. If the doors are shut, the officer
shall declare the officer's office and the officer's business and demand
entrance[.]; provided that:
(1) The officer shall
audibly declare the officer's office and business and wait a reasonable time of
at least thirty seconds before entry;
(2) The thirty seconds shall commence at the moment the
announcement of presence is made by the officer; and
(3) The officer shall not be required to wait
if exigent circumstances exist that cause waiting to be hazardous or otherwise impracticable.
If the doors, gates, or other bars to the entrance
are not [immediately] opened[,] within a reasonable time of at
least thirty seconds, the officer may break them. When entered, the officer may demand that any
other part of the house, or any closet or other closed place in which the
officer has reason to believe the property is concealed, may be opened for the
officer's inspection, and if refused the officer may break them. If an electronic device or storage media is
designated as the item to be searched, the court may authorize the officer to
obtain technical assistance from individuals or entities, located within or
outside the State, in the examination of the item; provided that the officer
shall submit a sworn statement to the judge or magistrate, certifying the
reliability and qualifications of the individuals or entities and the reason
their assistance is necessary; provided further that no individual or entity
shall be compelled to provide technical assistance without their consent."
SECTION 5. Section 805-1, Hawaii Revised Statutes, is amended to read as follows:
"§805-1 Complaint; form of
warrant. When a complaint is made to
any prosecuting officer of the commission of any offense, the prosecuting
officer shall examine the complainant, shall reduce the substance of the
complaint to writing, and shall cause the complaint to be subscribed by the complainant under oath,
which the prosecuting officer is hereby authorized to administer, or the complaint shall be made by
declaration in accordance with the rules of court. If the original complaint results from the
issuance of a traffic summons or a citation in lieu of an arrest pursuant to section
803-6, by a police officer, the oath may be administered by any police officer
whose name has been submitted to the prosecuting officer and who has been
designated by the chief of police to administer the oath, or the complaint may be submitted by declaration in accordance
with the rules of court. Upon
presentation of the written complaint to the judge in whose circuit the offense allegedly has been committed, the judge shall issue a
warrant, reciting the complaint and requiring the sheriff, or other officer to
whom it is directed, except as
provided in section 805-3, to arrest the accused and to bring the
accused before the judge to be dealt with according to law; and in the same warrant
the judge may require
the officer to summon [such] witnesses [as are] named in the warrant to appear and
give evidence at the trial. The warrant
may be in the form established by the usage and practice of the issuing court[.];
provided that:
(1) No warrant shall
issue that permits any officer to enter a house, store, or other building without
audibly declaring the officer's office and business and waiting a reasonable time
of at least thirty seconds for compliance before entry;
(2) The thirty seconds
shall commence at the moment the announcement of presence is made by the officer; and
(3) An officer acting in accordance with the requirements of this section shall not be required to wait if exigent circumstances exist that cause waiting to be hazardous or otherwise impracticable."
SECTION 6. This Act does not affect rights and duties that matured, penalties that were incurred, and proceedings that were begun before its effective date.
SECTION 7. Statutory material to be repealed is bracketed and stricken. New statutory material is underscored.
SECTION 8. This Act shall take effect upon its approval.
INTRODUCED BY: |
_____________________________ |
|
|
Report Title:
Law Enforcement; No-knock Warrants; Prohibition
Description:
Prohibits the issuance of warrants, including no-knock warrants, that permit entry by an officer to a house, store, or other building without first audibly declaring the officer's office and business. Requires law enforcement officers serving an arrest warrant at a house or a search warrant at a house, store, or other building to audibly declare the officer's office and business and wait at least thirty seconds for compliance before entry. Requires officers serving a warrant to do so while wearing an authorized uniform and activated body-worn video camera.
The summary description
of legislation appearing on this page is for informational purposes only and is
not legislation or evidence of legislative intent.