STAND. COM. REP. NO. 3725

 

Honolulu, Hawaii

                  

 

RE:    H.B. No. 2060

       H.D. 1

       S.D. 1

 

 

 

Honorable Ronald D. Kouchi

President of the Senate

Thirtieth State Legislature

Regular Session of 2020

State of Hawaii

 

Sir:

 

     Your Committee on Judiciary, to which was referred H.B. No. 2060, H.D. 1, entitled:

 

"A BILL FOR AN ACT RELATING TO DOMESTIC ABUSE,"

 

begs leave to report as follows:

 

     The purpose and intent of this measure is to provide that if a court denies a temporary restraining order, protective order, or extended protective order, the court may order upon the oral request of the respondent that the petition record be withheld from public inspection, provided that the record remains accessible to law enforcement officers without a court order.

 

     Your Committee received testimony in support of this measure from the Domestic Violence Action Center, American Association of University Women of Hawaii, Hawaii Women's Coalition, Planned Parenthood Votes Northwest and Hawaii, and eight individuals.  Your Committee received testimony in opposition to this measure from Rainbow Family 808.  Your Committee received comments on this measure from the Judiciary and Civil Beat Law Center for Public Interest.

 

     Your Committee finds that victims of domestic abuse who petition the courts for temporary restraining orders may face retaliatory acts from their abusers in the form of counter-petitions for the same relief.  Even though the retaliatory petitions have no basis in fact, the public record of the petitions can negatively impact the domestic abuse victims' employment and housing prospects and hinder the victims' efforts to gain physical and financial independence from their abusers.  This measure permits family court judges to withhold from public inspection any record of a denied temporary restraining order or denied protective order, provided that the records remain accessible to law enforcement officers without a court order.

 

     Your Committee has amended this measure by:

 

     (1)  Clarifying that the person sought to be restrained by the order, in addition to the respondent, may request that the petition record be withheld from public inspection;

 

     (2)  Making it effective upon its approval; and

 

     (3)  Making technical, nonsubstantive amendments for the purposes of clarity and consistency.

 

     As affirmed by the record of votes of the members of your Committee on Judiciary that is attached to this report, your Committee is in accord with the intent and purpose of H.B. No. 2060, H.D. 1, as amended herein, and recommends that it pass Second Reading in the form attached hereto as H.B. No. 2060, H.D. 1, S.D. 1, and be placed on the calendar for Third Reading.

 

Respectfully submitted on behalf of the members of the Committee on Judiciary,

 

 

 

________________________________

KARL RHOADS, Chair