HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES |
H.B. NO. |
2502 |
THIRTIETH LEGISLATURE, 2020 |
|
|
STATE OF HAWAII |
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
A BILL FOR AN ACT
relating to health.
BE IT ENACTED BY THE LEGISLATURE OF THE STATE OF HAWAII:
SECTION 1. The legislature finds that there is a shortage
of healthcare professionals in the State, and that this shortage is especially acute
in rural areas. According to the federal
Health Resources and Services Administration, an entity of the United States Department
of Health and Human Services, there were 17,657 geographic areas, populations, and
facilities designated as having too few primary care, dental, and mental health
care providers.
In Hawaii, the Health Resources and Services
Administration reported that the counties of Hawaii and Maui each have an average
deficiency of twenty-five full-time healthcare service professionals, while the
county of Kauai has a shortage of thirteen full-time healthcare service professionals.
These shortages are expected to worsen as
physicians and nurses working in rural areas retire faster than new healthcare recruits
can replace them. Simultaneously, the population
in the State's rural areas has increased in recent years, even as the State's overall
population has seen a decline. These two
factors combined will lead to a worsening of the ratio between healthcare professionals
to patients. The legislature recognizes that
as this ratio worsens, so may patient quality of care.
To counteract this trend, there is a demand
for an increase in healthcare facilities in the State's rural areas. However, each new healthcare facility that opens
must hire qualified healthcare professionals to staff the facility. Unfortunately, this often results in the new facility
seeking to hire professionals from existing facilities in the local area.
The legislature finds that recruitment of this
nature may negatively impact the quality of medical care at existing facilities
by increasing the ratio of healthcare professionals to patients and forcing the
facility to increase overtime or hire temporary staff to cover the resulting staffing
shortfall. The legislature recognizes that
there is a demand for expanded healthcare services in rural areas; however, the
legislature also recognizes that policies must be adopted to protect the viability
and quality of existing healthcare services while not restricting the ability of
new healthcare facilities to open in rural areas. The legislature further finds that the state health
planning and development agency currently does not specifically address this issue
through its certificate of need program.
Accordingly, the purpose of this Act is to provide
existing hospitals and dialysis facilities in rural communities with the right of
first refusal to internally expand their facilities to address the needs of their
communities prior to issuing a certificate of need to an applicant seeking to open
a new hospital or dialysis facility in the same rural subarea.
SECTION 2. Chapter 323D, Hawaii Revised Statutes, is amended by adding a new section to part V to be appropriately designated and to read as follows:
"§323D- Existing hospitals and dialysis facilities;
right of first refusal. (a) If:
(1) An applicant for
a certificate of need is seeking to establish a new hospital or dialysis facility
in a rural subarea; and
(2) The state agency
determines that there is a public need for the hospital or dialysis facility
pursuant to section 323D-43(b),
the state agency, before issuing a certificate of
need, shall offer existing hospitals, in the case of an applicant seeking to establish
a new hospital, or dialysis facilities, in the case of an applicant seeking to establish
a new dialysis facility, operating in that rural subarea a right of first refusal
to expand their facilities or services to meet the public need identified in paragraph
(2).
(b) An existing hospital or dialysis facility that
elects to exercise a right of first refusal pursuant to this section shall do so
within sixty days of the date the state agency offers the right of first refusal
to the hospital or dialysis facility. The
hospital or dialysis facility that wishes to exercise a right of first refusal shall
file an application with the state agency that includes:
(1) A statement evaluating
the hospital or dialysis facility's proposed expansion to meet the public need identified
by the state agency in subsection (a)(2), including the probable impact on health
care costs and any other information required by the state agency as provided by
rule; and
(2) Cost projections
for at least the first and third years after its approval.
(c) The state agency shall review the application submitted
pursuant to subsection (b) in consultation with appropriate subarea
councils, the review panel, the statewide council, appropriate individuals, and
appropriate public agencies. If the state
agency determines that the cost of the facility or service will not be unreasonable
in the light of the benefits it will provide and its impact on health care costs,
the state agency shall:
(1) Approve the existing
hospital or dialysis facility's application and issue a certificate of need to the
existing hospital or dialysis facility; and
(2) Deny the pending
application from the applicant seeking to establish a new hospital or dialysis facility.
(d) If multiple hospitals or dialysis facilities operate
in a rural subarea elect to exercise a right of first refusal, the state agency,
in consultation with the appropriate subarea councils, the review panel, the statewide
council, appropriate individuals, and appropriate public agencies, may select and
issue a certificate of need to one or more hospitals or dialysis facilities.
(e) The state agency shall issue a decision on the
application submitted pursuant to subsection (b) within sixty days of the application's
submission, unless the state agency within the sixty days notifies the applicant
in writing that the period for agency review has been extended by the state agency;
provided that the extension shall be for a period of no more than an additional
sixty days. The decision shall be subject
to post-decision review procedures that the state agency may provide for by rules
adopted pursuant to chapter 91.
(f) The state agency may adopt rules pursuant to chapter 91
to implement this section.
(g) For the purpose of this section:
"Hospital" means an entity
licensed as a hospital by the department of health pursuant to section 321-14.5.
"Dialysis facility" means an entity licensed by the department of health to provide dialysis services."
SECTION 2. Section 323D-2, Hawaii Revised Statutes, is amended by adding a new definition to be appropriately inserted and to read as follows:
""Rural subarea" means a subarea whose population density is less than or equal to eight hundred people per square mile, as determined by the population of the last official census conducted by the United States Census Bureau."
SECTION 3. Section 323D-43, Hawaii Revised Statutes, is amended by amending subsection (b) to read as follows:
"(b) No certificate of need shall be issued unless the state agency has determined that:
(1) There is a public need for the facility or the service; and
(2) The cost of the
facility or service will not be unreasonable in the light of the benefits it
will provide and its impact on health care costs[.];
provided that an application for a certificate of need that seeks to establish a new hospital within a rural subarea shall be subject to a right of first refusal by existing hospitals or dialysis facilities pursuant to section 323D- ."
SECTION 4. Section 323D-44, Hawaii Revised Statutes, is amended by amending subsection (b) to read as follows:
"(b) The state agency shall issue a decision on
the application within ninety days after the beginning of the period for agency
review, unless the state agency within the ninety days notifies the applicant
in writing that the period for agency review has been extended by the state
agency sixty days beyond the ninety days[.]; provided that a decision
for an application for a certificate of need for a new hospital or dialysis facility
in a rural subarea shall include only a determination of:
(1) Whether there is
a public need for the facility or service; and
(2) Whether the cost
of the facility or service will not be unreasonable in the light of the benefits
it will provide and its impact on health care costs,
provided further that the application for the certificate of need for a new hospital or dialysis facility in a rural subarea shall be subject to a right of first refusal pursuant to section 323D- . The decision shall be subject to post-decision review procedures which the state agency may provide for by rules adopted in conformity with chapter 91."
SECTION 5. Statutory material to be repealed is bracketed and stricken. New statutory material is underscored.
SECTION 6. This Act shall take effect upon its approval.
INTRODUCED BY: |
_____________________________ |
|
|
Report Title:
DOH; SHPDA; Health; Hospitals; Dialysis Facilities; Certificate of Need; Rural Areas
Description:
Requires the State Health Planning and Development Agency to grant an existing hospital or dialysis facility in a rural subarea a right of first refusal to expand its existing facilities or services if a competing entity files a certificate of need application to establish a new hospital or dialysis facility in the same rural subarea. Defines "rural subarea."
The summary description
of legislation appearing on this page is for informational purposes only and is
not legislation or evidence of legislative intent.