HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES |
H.B. NO. |
2446 |
THIRTIETH LEGISLATURE, 2020 |
|
|
STATE OF HAWAII |
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
A BILL FOR AN ACT
relating to affordable housing.
BE IT ENACTED BY THE LEGISLATURE OF THE STATE OF HAWAII:
SECTION 1. The legislature recognizes that Hawaii is experiencing a severe affordable housing crisis with a lack of affordable rental and for-sale units. Government must do all it can to support affordable housing. The legislature further finds that Hawaii must build at least twenty-two thousand affordable rental housing units by 2026.
According to the "Affordable Rental Housing
Report and Ten-Year Plan", prepared by the department of business, economic
development, and tourism (July 2018), housing demand is projected to reach
64,693 units by 2025, with nearly seventy per cent (43,828 units) needed for
households earning eighty per cent or less of the area median income.
The purpose of this Act is to require the department
of land and natural resources, through the state historic preservation division,
to contract its review of proposed state projects, projects on privately owned
historic property, and projects affecting historic properties to third-party
consultants if the projects involve the development of affordable housing and
the department will not be able to complete its review within sixty days.
SECTION 2. Section 6E-8, Hawaii Revised Statutes, is amended to read as follows:
"§6E-8 Review
of effect of proposed state projects.
(a) Before
any agency or officer of the State or its political subdivisions commences any
project which may affect historic property, aviation artifact, or a burial
site, the agency or officer shall advise the department and allow the
department an opportunity for review of the effect of the proposed project on
historic properties, aviation artifacts, or burial sites, consistent with
section 6E-43, especially those listed on the Hawaii register of historic
places. The proposed project shall not
be commenced, or if it has already begun, continued, until the department has
given its written concurrence. If:
(1) The proposed project consists of corridors or large land areas;
(2) Access to properties is restricted; or
(3) Circumstances dictate that construction be done in stages,
the department may give its written concurrence based on a phased review of the project; provided that there shall be a programmatic agreement between the department and the project applicant that identifies each phase and the estimated timelines for each phase.
The
department shall provide written concurrence or non-concurrence within ninety
days after the filing of a request with the department. The agency or officer seeking to proceed with
the project, or any person, may appeal the department's concurrence or non-concurrence
to the Hawaii historic places review board.
An agency, officer, or other person who is dissatisfied with the
decision of the review board may apply to the governor, who may take action as
the governor deems best in overruling or sustaining the department.
(b)
The department of Hawaiian home lands, prior to any proposed project
relating to lands under its jurisdiction, shall consult with the department regarding
the effect of the project upon historic property or a burial site.
(c)
The State, its political subdivisions, agencies, and officers shall report
to the department the finding of any historic property during any project and
shall cooperate with the department in the investigation, recording,
preservation, and salvage of the property.
(d) Whenever the proposed state project involves the
development of affordable housing, as that term is defined under section 201H-57,
the department shall immediately retain a third-party consultant without regard
to chapter 103D to conduct the review described under subsection (a) if, in its
discretion, the department determines that:
(1) It will not be able
to provide its written concurrence or non-concurrence within sixty days of the filing
of the request with the department;
(2) The third-party consultant
has the qualifications and experience to conduct the review; and
(3) The third-party
consultant will be able to provide a recommendation to the department within thirty
days of the filing of the request with the department.
[(d)] (e) The department shall adopt rules in accordance
with chapter 91 to implement this section."
SECTION 3. Section 6E-10, Hawaii Revised Statutes, is amended to read as follows:
"§6E-10 Privately owned historic property.
(a) Before any construction,
alteration, disposition or improvement of any nature, by, for, or permitted by
a private landowner may be commenced which will affect an historic property on
the Hawaii register of historic places, the landowner shall notify the
department of the construction, alteration, disposition, or improvement of any
nature and allow the department opportunity for review of the effect of the
proposed construction, alteration, disposition, or improvement of any nature on
the historic property. The proposed
construction, alteration, disposition, or improvement of any nature shall not
be commenced, or in the event it has already begun, continue, until the
department shall have given its concurrence or ninety days have elapsed. Within ninety days after notification, the
department shall:
(1) Commence condemnation proceedings for the purchase of the historic property if the department and property owner do not agree upon an appropriate course of action;
(2) Permit the owner to proceed with the owner's construction, alteration, or improvement; or
(3) In coordination with the owner, undertake or permit the investigation, recording, preservation, and salvage of any historical information deemed necessary to preserve Hawaiian history, by any qualified agency for this purpose.
(b) Nothing in this section shall be construed to prevent the ordinary maintenance or repair of any feature in or on an historic property that does not involve a change in design, material, or outer appearance or change in those characteristics which qualified the historic property for entry onto the Hawaii register of historic places.
(c) Any person, natural or corporate, who violates the provisions of this section shall be fined not more than $1,000, and each day of continued violation shall constitute a distinct and separate offense under this section for which the offender may be punished.
(d) If funds for the acquisition of needed property are not available, the governor may, upon the recommendation of the department allocate from the contingency fund an amount sufficient to acquire an option on the property or for the immediate acquisition, preservation, restoration, or operation of the property.
(e) Whenever the construction, alteration, disposition,
or improvement relates to the development of affordable housing, as that term is
defined under section 201H-57, the department shall immediately retain a third-party
consultant without regard to chapter 103D to conduct the review described under
subsection (a) if, in its discretion, the department determines that:
(1) It will not be able
to provide its written concurrence or non-concurrence within sixty days of the landowner's
notification;
(2) The third-party consultant
has the qualifications and experience to conduct the review; and
(3) The third-party consultant will be able to provide a recommendation to the department within thirty days of the landowner's notification.
[(e)] (f) The department or the third-party consultant,
as applicable, may enter, solely in performance of [its] the department's
official duties and only at reasonable times, upon private lands for examination
or survey thereof. Whenever any member
of the department or the department's third-party consultant, as applicable,
duly authorized to conduct investigations and surveys of an historic or
cultural nature determines that entry onto private lands for examination or
survey of historic or cultural finding is required, the department or the department's
third-party consultant, as applicable, shall give written notice of the
finding to the owner or occupant of such property at least five days prior to
entry. If entry is refused, the member or
the department's third-party consultant, as applicable, may make a
complaint to the district environmental court in the circuit in which such land
is located. The district environmental court
may thereupon issue a warrant, directed to any police officer of the circuit, commanding
the officer to take sufficient aid, and, being accompanied by a member of the
department[,] or the department's third-party consultant, as applicable,
between the hours of sunrise and sunset, allow the member of the department or
the department's third-party consultant, as applicable, to examine or
survey the historic or cultural property."
SECTION 4. Section 6E-42, Hawaii Revised Statutes, is amended to read as follows:
"§6E-42 Review of proposed projects. (a) Except as provided in section 6E-42.2, before any agency or officer of the State or its political subdivisions approves any project involving a permit, license, certificate, land use change, subdivision, or other entitlement for use, which may affect historic property, aviation artifacts, or a burial site, the agency or office shall advise the department and prior to any approval allow the department an opportunity for review and comment on the effect of the proposed project on historic properties, aviation artifacts, or burial sites, consistent with section 6E-43, including those listed in the Hawaii register of historic places. If:
(1) The proposed project consists of corridors or large land areas;
(2) Access to properties is restricted; or
(3) Circumstances dictate that construction be done in stages,
the department's review and comment may be based on a phased review of the project; provided that there shall be a programmatic agreement between the department and the project applicant that identifies each phase and the estimated timelines for each phase.
(b)
The department shall inform the public of any project proposals submitted
to it under this section that are not otherwise subject to the requirement of a
public hearing or other public notification.
(c) Whenever the project involves the development of
affordable housing, as that term is defined under section 201H‑57, the department
shall immediately retain a third-party consultant without regard to chapter 103D
to conduct the review and comment described under subsection (a) if, in its discretion,
the department determines that:
(1) It will not be able
to provide its review and comment within sixty days of the advising;
(2) The third-party consultant
has the qualifications and experience to conduct the review and comment; and
(3) The third-party consultant will be able to provide a recommendation to the department within thirty days of the advising.
[(c)] (d) The department shall adopt rules in accordance
with chapter 91 to implement this section."
SECTION 5. This Act does not affect rights and duties that matured, penalties that were incurred, and proceedings that were begun before its effective date.
SECTION 6. Statutory material to be repealed is bracketed and stricken. New statutory material is underscored.
SECTION 7. This Act shall take effect upon its approval.
INTRODUCED BY: |
_____________________________ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Report Title:
State Historic Preservation Division; Affordable Housing
Description:
Requires the State Historic Preservation Division to contract its review of proposed state projects, projects on privately owned historic property, and projects affecting historic properties to third-party consultants if the projects involve the development of affordable housing and the division will not be able to complete its review within 60 days.
The summary description
of legislation appearing on this page is for informational purposes only and is
not legislation or evidence of legislative intent.