STAND. COM. REP. NO. 2602

 

Honolulu, Hawaii

                  

 

RE:    S.B. No. 2888

       S.D. 2

 

 

 

Honorable Ronald D. Kouchi

President of the Senate

Twenty-Eighth State Legislature

Regular Session of 2016

State of Hawaii

 

Sir:

 

     Your Committees on Judiciary and Labor and Ways and Means, to which was referred S.B. No. 2888, S.D. 1, entitled:

 

"A BILL FOR AN ACT RELATING TO FORENSIC MENTAL HEALTH PROCEDURES,"

 

beg leave to report as follows:

 

     The purpose and intent of this measure is to:

 

     (1)  Amend section 704-404, Hawaii Revised Statutes (HRS), to bifurcate the examination for penal responsibility from the examination for fitness to proceed and establish procedures for the determination of a defendant's penal responsibility and fitness to proceed;

 

     (2)  Establish procedures for the determination of a defendant's regained fitness to proceed pursuant to section 704-406, HRS; and

 

     (3)  Make conforming amendments to reflect the amendments made to section 704-404, HRS.

 

     Your Committees received testimony in support of this measure from the Department of Health.  Your Committees received testimony in opposition to this measure from the Department of the Prosecuting Attorney, City and County of Honolulu.  Your Committees received comments on this measure from the Hawaii Disability Rights Center and two individuals.

 

     Your Committees find that under section 704-404, HRS, when a defendant's fitness to proceed comes into question, the criminal proceedings are stopped, and the court must order a physical or mental examination of the defendant to determine the defendant's fitness to proceed and whether the defendant possesses the penal responsibility for the alleged crime.  During this period of time, a pretrial defendant, who may have a serious mental disease or defect, may be held in state custody for more than thirty days awaiting the evaluation due to the complexity of conducting an evaluation that examines fitness to proceed and penal responsibility.  Your Committees further find that it is in the best interest of the defendants for the examination process to proceed in a timely, expedient manner by separating the fitness to stand trial and the penal responsibility components of examinations and codifying procedures for appointing examiners for reevaluation of fitness.

 

     Accordingly, your Committees have amended this measure by:

 

     (1)  Clarifying that a court is required to order the examination for penal responsibility no later than thirty days after a finding of a defendant's fitness to proceed, if the examinations are separate;

 

     (2)  Clarifying that only the relevant records of a defendant shall be made available to examiners and no further disclosure of these records shall be made except as permitted by law;

 

     (3)  Adopting the language suggested by the Department of Health that clarifies that a defendant may be released on conditions if the court is satisfied that the defendant may be released on conditions without danger to the defendant or another or risk of substantial danger to property, rather than without risk of danger to the defendant or the person or property of others;

 

     (4)  To address the concerns raised by the Department of the Prosecuting Attorney of the City and County of Honolulu, adding a felony for which charging by written permission is not permitted by section 806-83, HRS, to the list of offenses with which a defendant must be charged in order for the three-panel examination to determine whether the defendant has regained fitness to proceed pursuant to procedures proposed by this measure to apply;

 

     (5)  Inserting an effective date of January 7, 2059, to encourage further discussion; and

 

     (6)  Making technical, nonsubstantive amendments for the purposes of clarity and consistency.

 

     As affirmed by the records of votes of the members of your Committees on Judiciary and Labor and Ways and Means that are attached to this report, your Committees are in accord with the intent and purpose of S.B. No. 2888, S.D. 1, as amended herein, and recommend that it pass Third Reading in the form attached hereto as S.B. No. 2888, S.D. 2.

 

Respectfully submitted on behalf of the members of the Committees on Judiciary and Labor and Ways and Means,

 

________________________________

JILL N. TOKUDA, Chair

 

________________________________

GILBERT S.C. KEITH-AGARAN, Chair