STAND. COM. REP. NO. 2048

 

Honolulu, Hawaii

                  

 

RE:    S.B. No. 2128

 

 

 

Honorable Donna Mercado Kim

President of the Senate

Twenty-Seventh State Legislature

Regular Session of 2014

State of Hawaii

 

Madam:

 

     Your Committee on Judiciary and Labor, to which was referred S.B. No. 2128 entitled:

 

"A BILL FOR AN ACT RELATING TO THE RETENTION OF BIOLOGICAL EVIDENCE,"

 

begs leave to report as follows:

 

     The purpose and intent of this measure is to:

 

     (1)  Provide guidelines and limitations for the post-conviction retention of biological evidence by the police, prosecuting attorney, laboratories, or courts; and

 

     (2)  Establish procedures for agencies to dispose of retained evidence and for defendants to file objections to proposed disposals.

 

     Your Committee received testimony in support of this measure from the Judiciary, Department of the Attorney General, Department of the Prosecuting Attorney of the City and County of Honolulu, Department of the Prosecuting Attorney of the County of Maui, Office of the Prosecuting Attorney of the County of Kauai, Police Department of the County of Hawaii, Police Department of the County of Maui, Police Department of the County of Kauai, and the Police Chiefs of Hawaii Association.  Testimony in opposition to this measure was submitted by the Office of the Public Defender and Community Alliance on Prisons.

 

     Your Committee finds that the existing law regarding the retention of biological evidence is broad and requires agencies to retain all evidence that may contain biological evidence in any case that results in a conviction regardless of whether the biological evidence is relevant to the case.  Testimony submitted in support of this measure indicates that the existing requirements for the retention of biological evidence have caused storage problems statewide.  This measure establishes reasonable guidelines for the retention of post-conviction biological evidence to address statewide evidence storage issues while preserving a defendant's ability to file objections to a proposed disposal of biological evidence.

 

     As affirmed by the record of votes of the members of your Committee on Judiciary and Labor that is attached to this report, your Committee is in accord with the intent and purpose of S.B. No. 2128 and recommends that it pass Second Reading and be placed on the calendar for Third Reading.

 

Respectfully submitted on behalf of the members of the Committee on Judiciary and Labor,

 

 

 

____________________________

CLAYTON HEE, Chair