STAND. COM. REP. NO. 2958
Honolulu, Hawaii
RE: H.B. No. 2724
H.D. 1
S.D. 1
Honorable Colleen Hanabusa
President of the Senate
Twenty-Fifth State Legislature
Regular Session of 2010
State of Hawaii
Madam:
Your Committee on Judiciary and Government Operations, to which was referred H.B. No. 2724, H.D. 1, entitled:
"A BILL FOR AN ACT RELATING TO OFFENSES AGAINST PUBLIC ORDER,"
begs leave to report as follows:
The purpose of this measure is to permit tethering of an unattended dog if the tether meets certain specifications and the dog is at least two months old.
Testimony in support of the measure was submitted by one private organization and three individuals. Testimony in support of the measure, with suggested amendments, was submitted by two private organizations. Comments regarding the measure were submitted by one state agency and two private organizations. Written testimony presented to your Committee may be reviewed on the Legislature's website.
Your Committee finds that this measure is intended to amend the prohibitions against tethering a dog and establish key requirements by which a person would be held accountable for cruelty to animals if found in violation. However, testimony regarding this measure indicates that there are still unaddressed concerns from various parties. Your Committee notes concerns raised by the Hawaii Farm Bureau Federation and the Hawaii Cattlemen's Council that this measure is not intended to criminalize certain practices that enable working dogs to learn their trade and stay safe, and it is your Committee's intent that only pet dogs will be covered by this measure and not working dogs used to assist with cattle herding, for example. Your Committee understands that the parties are working together to develop a draft to sort out these points.
Your Committee notes that a measure similar to H.B. No. 2724, H.D. 1, was heard and approved by your Committee and passed by the Senate. Given the ongoing discussion between the parties, your Committee believes that substituting the contents of the similar measure, S.B. No. 2877, S.D. 1, will encourage discussion on these unanswered issues.
Accordingly, your Committee has amended this measure by deleting its contents and substituting the contents of S.B. No. 2877, S.D. 1, which establishes a new violation of confinement of a dog by tethering, prohibiting a person from tethering a dog if the person intentionally, knowingly, or recklessly tethers, fastens, ties, or restrains a dog under certain conditions.
As affirmed by the record of votes of the members of your Committee on Judiciary and Government Operations that is attached to this report, your Committee is in accord with the intent and purpose of H.B. No. 2724, H.D. 1, as amended herein, and recommends that it pass Second Reading in the form attached hereto as H.B. No. 2724, H.D. 1, S.D. 1, and be placed on the calendar for Third Reading.
Respectfully submitted on behalf of the members of the Committee on Judiciary and Government Operations,
|
|
____________________________ BRIAN T. TANIGUCHI, Chair |
|
|
|