Report Title:

Public Contracts; Bid Protest

 

Description:

Requires purchasing agencies, when posting public contract awards, to include information regarding the basis for the award.

 


THE SENATE

S.B. NO.

2827

TWENTY-FOURTH LEGISLATURE, 2008

 

STATE OF HAWAII

 

 

 

 

 

A BILL FOR AN ACT

 

 

Relating to Public Contracts.

 

 

BE IT ENACTED BY THE LEGISLATURE OF THE STATE OF HAWAII:

 


     SECTION 1.  The legislature finds that bidders in a public contract award are often unaware that there is cause for filing a protest prior to the deadline for filing a protest.

     The purpose of this Act is to require the purchasing agency to supply public contract bidders with the information required to determine if there is a need to investigate filing a protest action, before such a filing becomes untimely.

     SECTION 2.  Section 103D-303, Hawaii Revised Statutes, is amended to read as follows:

     "§103D-303  Competitive sealed proposals.  (a)  Competitive sealed proposals may be utilized to procure goods, services, or construction designated in rules adopted by the procurement policy board as goods, services, or construction [which] that are either not practicable or not advantageous to the State to procure by competitive sealed bidding.  Competitive sealed proposals may also be utilized when the head of a purchasing agency determines in writing that the use of competitive sealed bidding is either not practicable or not advantageous to the State.

     (b)  Proposals shall be solicited through a request for proposals.

     (c)  Notice of the request for proposals shall be given in the same manner as provided in section 103D-302(c).

     (d)  Proposals shall be opened so as to avoid disclosure of contents to competing offerors during the process of negotiation.  A register of proposals shall be prepared in accordance with rules adopted by the policy board and shall be open for public inspection after contract award.

     (e)  The request for proposals shall state the relative importance of price and other evaluation factors.

     (f)  Discussions may be conducted with responsible offerors who submit proposals determined to be reasonably susceptible of being selected for award for the purpose of clarification to assure full understanding of, and responsiveness to, the solicitation requirements.  Offerors shall be accorded fair and equal treatment with respect to any opportunity for discussion and revision of proposals, and revisions may be permitted after submissions and prior to award for the purpose of obtaining best and final offers.  In conducting discussions, there shall be no disclosure of any information derived from proposals submitted by competing offerors.

     (g)  [Award] An award shall be made to the responsible offeror whose proposal is determined in writing to be the most advantageous taking into consideration price and the evaluation factors set forth in the request for proposals.  No other factors or criteria shall be used in the evaluation.  The contract file shall contain the basis on which the award is made.

     (h)  The purchasing agency shall include the following in its posting of the award of the contract:

     (1)  The register of proposals;

     (2)  The name of the successful offeror and the dollar amount of the offer;

     (3)  The evaluation of proposals completed by each person on the evaluation committee who participated in the evaluation process, which includes:

         (A)  The numeric rating points awarded to each offeror for each of the evaluation criteria, if any; and

         (B)  The total number of numeric rating points awarded to each offeror, if any; and

     (4)  The basis for selecting the successful offeror;

provided that trade secrets or other proprietary or confidential information shall not be disclosed in the posting of the award.

     [(h)] (i)  In cases of awards made under this section, nonselected offerors may submit a written request for debriefing to the chief procurement officer or designee within three working days after the posting of the award of the contract.  Thereafter, the head of the purchasing agency shall provide the requester a prompt debriefing in accordance with rules adopted by the policy board.  Any protest by the requester pursuant to section 103D-701 following debriefing shall be filed in writing with the chief procurement officer or designee within five working days after the date that the debriefing is completed."

     SECTION 3.  Section 103D-304, Hawaii Revised Statutes, is amended to read as follows:

     "§103D-304  Procurement of professional services.  (a)  Professional services shall be procured in accordance with sections 103D-302, 103D-303, 103D-305, 103D-306, or 103D-307, or this section; provided that design professional services furnished by licensees under chapter 464 shall be procured pursuant to this section or section 103D-307.  Contracts for professional services shall be awarded on the basis of demonstrated competence and qualification for the type of services required, and at fair and reasonable prices.

     (b)  At a minimum, before the beginning of each fiscal year, the head of each purchasing agency shall publish a notice inviting persons engaged in providing professional services which the agency anticipates needing in the next fiscal year, to submit current statements of qualifications and expressions of interest to the agency.  Additional notices shall be given if:

     (1)  The response to the initial notice is inadequate;

     (2)  The response to the initial notice does not result in adequate representation of available sources;

     (3)  New needs for professional services arise; or

     (4)  Rules adopted by the policy board so specify.

The chief procurement officer may specify a uniform format for statements of qualifications.  Persons may amend these statements by filing a new statement prior to the date designated for submission.

     (c)  The head of the purchasing agency shall designate a review committee consisting of a minimum of three persons with sufficient education, training, and licenses or credentials for each type of professional service which may be required.  In designating the members of the review committee, the head of the purchasing agency shall ensure the impartiality and independence of committee members.  The names of the members of the review committee established under this section shall be placed in the contract file.

     The committee shall review and evaluate all submissions and other pertinent information, including references and reports, and prepare a list of qualified persons to provide these services.  Persons included on the list of qualified persons may amend their statements of qualifications as necessary or appropriate.  Persons shall immediately inform the head of the purchasing agency of any change in information furnished [which] that would disqualify the person from being considered for a contract award.

     (d)  Whenever during the course of the fiscal year the agency needs a particular professional service, the head of the purchasing agency shall designate a selection committee to evaluate the statements of qualification and performance data of those persons on the list prepared pursuant to subsection (c) along with any other pertinent information, including references and reports.  The selection committee shall be comprised of a minimum of three persons with sufficient education, training, and licenses or credentials in the area of the services required.  In designating the members of the selection committee, the head of the purchasing agency shall ensure the impartiality and independence of committee members.  The names of the members of a selection committee established under this section shall be placed in the contract file.

     (e)  The selection criteria employed in descending order of importance shall be:

     (1)  Experience and professional qualifications relevant to the project type;

     (2)  Past performance on projects of similar scope for public agencies or private industry, including corrective actions and other responses to notices of deficiencies;

     (3)  Capacity to accomplish the work in the required time; and

     (4)  Any additional criteria determined in writing by the selection committee to be relevant to the purchasing agency's needs or necessary and appropriate to ensure full, open, and fair competition for professional services contracts.

     (f)  The selection committee shall evaluate the submissions of persons on the list prepared pursuant to subsection (c) and any other pertinent information [which] that may be available to the agency, against the selection criteria.  The committee may conduct confidential discussions with any person who is included on the list prepared pursuant to subsection (c) regarding the services [which] that are required and the services they are able to provide.  In conducting discussions, there shall be no disclosure of any information derived from the competing professional service offerors.

     (g)  The selection committee shall rank a minimum of three persons based on the selection criteria and send the ranking to the head of the purchasing agency.  The contract file shall contain a copy of the summary of qualifications for the ranking of each of the persons provided to the head of the purchasing agency for contract negotiations.  If more than one person holds the same qualifications under this section, the selection committee shall rank the persons in a manner that ensures equal distribution of contracts among the persons holding the same qualifications.  The recommendations of the selection committee shall not be overturned without due cause.

     (h)  The head of the purchasing agency or designee shall negotiate a contract with the first ranked person, including a rate of compensation which is fair and reasonable, established in writing, and based upon the estimated value, scope, complexity, and nature of the services to be rendered.  If a satisfactory contract cannot be negotiated with the first ranked person, negotiations with that person shall be formally terminated and negotiations with the second ranked person on the list shall commence.  The contract file shall include documentation from the head of the purchasing agency, or designee, to support selection of other than the first ranked or next ranked person.  Failing accord with the second ranked person, negotiations with the next ranked person on the list shall commence.  If a contract at a fair and reasonable price cannot be negotiated, the selection committee may be asked to submit a minimum of three additional persons for the head of the purchasing agency to resume negotiations in the same manner provided in this subsection.  Negotiations shall be conducted confidentially.

     (i)  Contracts awarded under this section for $5,000 or more shall be posted electronically within seven days of the contract award by the chief procurement officer or designee and shall remain posted for at least one year.  Information to be posted shall include, but not be limited to:

     (1)  The names of the persons submitted under subsection (g);

     (2)  The name of the person or organization receiving the award;

     (3)  The dollar amount of the contract;

     (4)  The name of the head of the purchasing agency or designee making the selection; and

     (5)  Any relationship of the principals to the official making the award.

     (j)  Contracts for professional services of less than the limits in section 103D-305, may be negotiated by the head of the purchasing agency, or designee, with at least any two persons on the list of qualified persons established pursuant to subsection (c).  Negotiations shall be conducted in the manner set forth in subsection (h), with ranking based on the selection criteria of subsection (e) as determined by the head of the agency.

     (k)  The purchasing agency shall include the following in its posting of the award of the contract:

     (1)  The register of proposals;

     (2)  The name of the successful offeror and the dollar amount of the offer;

     (3)  The evaluation of proposals completed by each person on the evaluation committee who participated in the evaluation process, which includes:

         (A)  The numeric rating points awarded to each offeror for each of the evaluation criteria, if any; and

         (B)  The total number of numeric rating points awarded to each offeror, if any; and

     (4)  The basis for selecting the successful offeror;

provided that trade secrets or other proprietary or confidential information shall not be disclosed in the posting of the award.

     [(k)] (l)  In cases of awards made under this section, nonselected professional service providers may submit a written request for debriefing to the chief procurement officer or designee within three working days after the posting of the award of the contract.  Thereafter, the head of the purchasing agency shall provide the requester a prompt debriefing in accordance with rules adopted by the policy board.  Any protest by the requester pursuant to section 103D-701 following debriefing shall be filed in writing with the chief procurement officer or designee within five working days after the date that the debriefing is completed."

     SECTION 4.  Statutory material to be repealed is bracketed and stricken.  New statutory material is underscored.

     SECTION 5.  This Act shall take effect upon its approval.

 

INTRODUCED BY:

_____________________________