Measure Title: | RELATING TO EMINENT DOMAIN. |
Report Title: | Eminent Domain; Urban and Economic Development; Prohibition |
Description: | Prohibits the exercise of eminent domain by the State, counties, or private entities for urban renewal or economic development purposes that result in the development of nongovernmental retail, office, commercial, residential, or industrial development. Exempts developments integral and required for public purpose projects from this prohibition. (HB2135 HD1) |
Package: | None |
Companion: | |
Introducer(s): | SCHATZ, BERG, EVANS, MEYER, MORITA, WATERS |
Current Referral: | WLO/EDB, JUD, FIN |
Date | Status Text | |
---|---|---|
1/20/2006 | H | To be Introduced |
1/23/2006 | H | Introduced and Pass First Reading. |
1/23/2006 | H | Referred to WLO/EDB, JUD, FIN, referral sheet 2 |
1/24/2006 | H | Bill scheduled to be heard by WLO/EDB on Friday, 01-27-06 at 8:30 am in House conference room 325. |
1/27/2006 | H | The committees on WLO recommend that the measure be PASSED, WITH AMENDMENTS. The votes were as follows: 8 Ayes: Representative(s) Kanoho, Schatz, Carroll, Morita, Waters, Thielen; Ayes with reservations: Representative(s) Berg, Harbin; 0 Noes: none; and 2 Excused: Representative(s) Evans, Meyer. |
1/27/2006 | H | The committees on EDB recommend that the measure be PASSED, WITH AMENDMENTS. The votes were as follows: 6 Ayes: Representative(s) Magaoay, Yamashita; Ayes with reservations: Representative(s) Karamatsu, Wakai, Abinsay, Marumoto; 0 Noes: none; and 4 Excused: Representative(s) Chang, Herkes, Tsuji, Ching. |
2/2/2006 | H | Reported from the committee on WLO/EDB (Stand. Com. Rep. No. 37-06) as amended in (HD 1), recommending passage on Second Reading and referral to the committee on JUD. |
2/3/2006 | H | Passed Second Reading as amended in (HD 1) and referred to the committee(s) on JUD with none voting no (0) and Representative(s) Halford, Kanoho, Saiki excused (3). |
$ = Appropriation measure
ConAm = Constitutional Amendment