STAND. COM. REP. NO. 282
Honolulu, Hawaii
, 2005
RE: H.B. No. 655
H.D. 1
Honorable Calvin K.Y. Say
Speaker, House of Representatives
Twenty-Third State Legislature
Regular Session of 2005
State of Hawaii
Sir:
Your Committee on Consumer Protection & Commerce, to which was referred H.B. No. 655 entitled:
"A BILL FOR AN ACT RELATING TO CONSUMER CREDIT REPORTING AGENCIES,"
begs leave to report as follows:
The purpose of this bill is to protect identity theft victims from further fraud by allowing them to place a "security freeze" on their credit reports which prohibits a credit reporting agency from releasing any information without the consumer's express authorization.
Testimony in support of this bill was submitted by the Department of Commerce and Consumer Affairs, Department of the Honolulu Prosecuting Attorney, and Honolulu Police Department. The Consumer Data Industry Association opposed this bill. The Hawaii Bankers Association commented on the bill.
Your Committee finds that this measure is designed to address one form of identity theft that occurs when an individual steals a consumer's identity and uses this information to open new lines of credit. A security freeze is a way to prevent a perpetrator from opening an account in the victim's name, and will assist in minimizing the damages suffered by identity theft victims and the financial losses suffered by commercial institutions.
While your Committee recognizes that this measure has value in preventing fraud and protecting consumers, the bill fails to address several issues. These include:
(1) The failure to specify the actual process of contacting the three credit reporting agencies by certified mail;
(2) The potential for the process to be complicated, confusing, and time-consuming for consumers; and
(3) The possibility that the security freeze could cut off legitimate commerce such as loan refinancing, or comparing insurance rates or loans online.
In light of these concerns, your Committee has amended this bill by:
(1) Changing the effective date to July 1, 2099, to facilitate further discussion; and
(2) Making technical, nonsubstantive amendments for clarity, consistency, and style.
As affirmed by the record of votes of the members of your Committee on Consumer Protection & Commerce that is attached to this report, your Committee is in accord with the intent and purpose of H.B. No. 655, as amended herein, and recommends that it pass Second Reading in the form attached hereto as H.B. No. 655, H.D. 1, and be referred to the Committee on Judiciary.
Respectfully submitted on behalf of the members of the Committee on Consumer Protection & Commerce,
____________________________ KENNETH HIRAKI, Chair |
||