STAND. COM. REP. NO. 1897
Honolulu, Hawaii
, 2005
RE: H.C.R. No. 172
H.D. 1
Honorable Robert Bunda
President of the Senate
Twenty-Third State Legislature
Regular Session of 2005
State of Hawaii
Sir:
Your Committee on Commerce, Consumer Protection, and Housing, to which was referred H.C.R. No. 172, H.D. 1, entitled:
"HOUSE CONCURRENT RESOLUTION REQUESTING THE AUDITOR TO PERFORM A SUNRISE REVIEW OF THE REGULATION OF PAYDAY LENDERS AND DEFERRED DEPOSIT CHECK CASHERS,"
begs leave to report as follows:
The purpose of this measure is to request the Auditor to conduct a "sunrise" analysis of the regulation of payday lenders and deferred deposit check cashers.
The Department of Commerce and Consumer Affairs (DCCA) and Money Service Centers of Hawaii, Inc. testified in support of this measure.
Senate Bill No. 1413, Regular Session of 2005, proposes to require deferred deposit check cashers, also known as "payday lenders" to file comprehensive annual reports with DCCA that disclose financial information about the check casher, provide detailed information about deferred deposit agreements made during the preceding calendar year, and verify that improper means are not being utilized to collect deferred deposits. Additionally, the bill would require check cashers to file copies of deferred deposit agreement forms with DCCA and to provide customers with a pamphlet that, among other things, informs customers that DCCA provides information about complaints filed about check cashers and the resolution of those complaints.
Your Committee finds that the above requirements appear to establish a system for the regulation of the check cashing profession. Your Committee further finds that the Hawaii Regulatory Licensing Reform Act (Act), codified in chapter 26H, HRS, requires that, before a bill is enacted that subjects a previously unregulated profession or vocation to regulatory control, the bill must first be referred by concurrent resolution to the Auditor for a "sunrise" analysis.
The Auditor is required to determine the probable effects of the proposed regulation, assess whether the bill's enactment is consistent with the Act's policies, and consider alternative forms of regulation. This measure effects the request to the Auditor for such an analysis.
As affirmed by the record of votes of the members of your Committee on Commerce, Consumer Protection, and Housing that is attached to this report, your Committee concurs with the intent and purpose of H.C.R. No. 172, H.D. 1, and recommends that it be referred to the Committee on Ways and Means.
Respectfully submitted on behalf of the members of the Committee on Commerce, Consumer Protection, and Housing,
____________________________ RON MENOR, Chair |
||