STAND. COM. REP. 3487
Honolulu, Hawaii
, 2004
RE: H.C.R. No. 261
H.D. 1
S.D. 1
Honorable Robert Bunda
President of the Senate
Twenty-Second State Legislature
Regular Session of 2004
State of Hawaii
Sir:
Your Committee on Judiciary and Hawaiian Affairs, to which was referred H.C.R. No. 261, H.D. 1, entitled:
"HOUSE CONCURRENT RESOLUTION REQUESTING THE LEGISLATIVE REFERENCE BUREAU TO REVIEW, ANALYZE, AND RECOMMEND CHANGES TO STATUTES, RULES, AND COUNTY ORDINANCES THAT CRIMINALIZE NON-SERIOUS OFFENSES,"
begs leave to report as follows:
The purpose of this measure is to request the Legislative Reference Bureau (LRB) to review, analyze, and recommend changes to statutes, rules, and county ordinances that criminalize non-serious offenses.
Testimony in support of this measure was submitted by the Judiciary. Testimony in opposition to this measure was submitted by the Department of Planning and Permitting of the City and County of Honolulu. Comments were submitted by the LRB.
Your Committee finds that the Legislature began decriminalizing certain non-serious traffic offenses to violations, eliminating most traffic arraignments, disposing of uncontested violations by mail, and providing informal hearings where violations or proposed penalties are questioned. Overall, the process was streamlined and the handling of traffic cases achieved a more expeditious system of judicial processing for traffic infractions.
Your Committee further finds that some offenses established by statutes other than the Hawaii Penal Code, including those established by rule or county ordinances, are:
(1) Petty misdemeanors or misdemeanors that must be processed by the courts, even if the offenses have penalties that are only fines; or
(2) Not of a serious nature but have penalties that include imprisonment or fines exceeding $1,000, and therefore must be processed by the courts as criminal offenses with the right to court-appointed counsel or jury trial, or both.
Your Committee finds that this inconsistent treatment of non-serious criminal offenses and the decriminalization of traffic infractions cause confusion for the public, who sometimes are arrested for failing to appear for citations even when they admitted to the offense and paid a fine by mail. This measure recommends that the LRB should evaluate all of the statutes, rules, and county ordinances that criminalize non-serious offenses and recommend changes to the penalties that should be more consistent with the decriminalized traffic infractions.
However, your Committee noted comments from the LRB that each county should be urged to review, analyze, and change its own county ordinances and rules that criminalize non-serious offenses.
Based on the LRB's comments, your Committee amended this measure by:
(1) Requesting the LRB to review, analyze, and recommend changes to only statutes and state rules;
(2) Urging each county to review, analyze, and make changes to county ordinances and rules that criminalize non-serious offenses;
(3) Removing county agencies that adopt rules and county councils as groups asked to cooperate with the LRB's study;
(4) Removing county councils as one of the groups that should receive a certified copy of the concurrent resolution; and
(5) Amending the title to reflect the changes made in paragraphs (1) and (2).
As affirmed by the record of votes of the members of your Committee on Judiciary and Hawaiian Affairs that is attached to this report, your Committee concurs with the intent and purpose of H.C.R. No. 261, H.D. 1, as amended herein, and recommends its adoption in the form attached hereto as H.C.R. No. 261, H.D. 1, S.D. 1.
Respectfully submitted on behalf of the members of the Committee on Judiciary and Hawaiian Affairs,
____________________________ COLLEEN HANABUSA, Chair |
||