STAND. COM. REP. 182
Honolulu, Hawaii
, 2003
RE: H.B. No. 616
Honorable Calvin K.Y. Say
Speaker, House of Representatives
Twenty-Second State Legislature
Regular Session of 2003
State of Hawaii
Sir:
Your Committee on Labor and Public Employment, to which was referred H.B. No. 616 entitled:
"A BILL FOR AN ACT RELATING TO STRIKES,"
begs leave to report as follows:
The purpose of this bill is to:
(1) Prohibit public employers from privatizing government services that are not being provided due to a lawful strike; and
(2) Mandate public employees and employee organizations to seek injunctive relief if a public employer violates certain laws relating to strikes.
HGEA-AFSCME Local 152, AFL-CIO and the Hawaii State Teachers Association testified in support of this measure. The Department of Human Resources Development and the Office of Collective Bargaining testified in opposition to this measure. The Department of Labor and Industrial Relations commented on this measure.
Currently, given the unrestricted ability of the public employer to privatize a government service pursuant to Act 90, Session Laws of Hawaii 2001, there is a need to provide a level of protection to public-sector workers who lawfully strike in accordance with chapter 89, Hawaii Revised Statutes. When the Legislature enacted Act 253, Session Laws of Hawaii 2000, public-sector employers and employees agreed to reinstate the right to strike for employees other than police officers and firefighters. To ensure that economic strikes would serve as an incentive for the employer to negotiate in good faith, essential worker designations were eliminated from civil service. This bill reaffirms the policy established under Act 253, while protecting striking workers' jobs.
However, your Committee recognizes that there may be instances where an economic strike may impact the health, welfare, and safety of our citizenry. As such, there must be sufficient safeguards to ensure that the employer will have avenues available for injunctive relief whenever state and federal health and safety requirements are not being met. While this idea brings forth many new concerns, these issues fall outside the purview of this Committee.
Despite these concerns, your Committee feels this measure warrants further discussion, with the hope that questions and concerns regarding injunctive relief for public-sector employers can be answered by the Committee on Judiciary.
As affirmed by the record of votes of the members of your Committee on Labor and Public Employment that is attached to this report, your Committee is in accord with the intent and purpose of H.B. No. 616 and recommends that it pass Second Reading and be referred to the Committee on Judiciary.
Respectfully submitted on behalf of the members of the Committee on Labor and Public Employment,
____________________________ MARCUS R. OSHIRO, Chair |
||