STAND. COM. REP. NO. 473-04

Honolulu, Hawaii

, 2004

RE: H.B. No. 2070

H.D. 1

 

 

 

Honorable Calvin K.Y. Say

Speaker, House of Representatives

Twenty-Second State Legislature

Regular Session of 2004

State of Hawaii

Sir:

Your Committee on Judiciary, to which was referred H.B. No. 2070 entitled:

"A BILL FOR AN ACT RELATING TO ELECTIONS,"

begs leave to report as follows:

The purpose of this bill is to establish a new public funding mechanism for campaign spending available to candidates for the state House of Representatives. This public funding mechanism is triggered when the Campaign Spending Commission determines that sufficient funds in the Hawaii Election Fund are available to support at least two candidates per district. In general, candidates are eligible for public funding if they collect qualifying contributions of $3 from one and one-half percent of the registered voters in their district and agree to run their political campaign exclusively with public funds and limit expenditures to permitted activities. Publicly funded candidates receive public funds in accordance with a formula based on 150 percent of the voluntary spending limits established in existing statute. However, publicly funded candidates may also receive "equalizing" funds if a privately funded opponent spends more than 50 percent or more than the public funds allotted to the publicly funded candidate.

Hawaii Clean Elections Coalition, Planned Parenthood of Hawaii, The First Unitarian Church, Hawaii State Commission on the Status of Women, Advocates for Consumer Rights, Parents and Children Together, Mayor of the County of Hawaii, Hawaii Coalition for Good Government, Green Party of Hawaii, The League of Women Voters of Hawaii, Life of the Land, The Interfaith Alliance Hawaii and numerous concerned citizens testified in favor of the bill. The Campaign Spending Commission opposed the bill.

Your Committee finds that it is necessary to restore voter confidence in our political system, which has been damaged by the revelations that numerous individuals and businesses violated the campaign contribution laws. In recent years, political campaigns have become costly for candidates to deliver their message to potential voters. As the cost of running for public office increases, so also does the need to raise funds to meet these expenses.

Public funding is an effective counter measure to the escalating costs of campaigning as well as the perception that candidates are forced to rely on private funding sources that may expect a return on their investment in a candidate. Widespread use of public funding programs will permit more candidates to run for office, provide the voters with choices on election day, and eliminate the perception that a candidate is influenced by the special interest groups that contributed to the candidate.

Your Committee is concerned about the section of the bill relating to "equalizing funds." The calculation of equalizing funds may burden the Campaign Spending Commission's limited staff resources. Further, your Committee is concerned about the ability to make a timely decision to equalize funds due to the reporting deadlines. Your Committee recommends that the discussion continue on this bill, and that, if necessary the Campaign Spending Commission be required to make recommendations on implementation of a method for equalizing funding.

Your Committee has amended the bill by:

(1) Adding definitions for "district," "declaration of intent to seek comprehensive public funding," "general election year," and amending the definition of "independent expenditure;"

(2) Clarifying that the Campaign Spending Commission's determination on sufficiency of funds for public funding is based on two candidates for the house of representatives for each district;

(3) Clarifying that the declaration of intent to seek comprehensive funding must be filed no later than the last date to file nominations papers for the primary election;

(4) Clarifying that seed money shall not be collected or spent after the declaration of intent to seek comprehensive public funding is filed;

(5) Specifying that the a candidate who is certified for comprehensive public funding shall disclose seed money contributions within 48 hours of certification;

(6) Amending the provisions that permits qualifying contributions to be returned to contributors if the candidate fails to be certified for public funding;

(7) Changing the deadline for submission of the application for certification for comprehensive public funding to fifteen business days before the primary election;

(8) Specifying that the selection candidates for certification for comprehensive public funding shall be based on first come, first served based on the date the application is submitted;

(9) Prohibiting loans made by the candidate to the campaign after the candidate is certified for public funding;

(10) Amending the reporting requirements to include reporting by the candidate's committee;

(11) Clarifying that the comprehensive publicly funded candidate shall not receive private contributions if the candidate is successful in being elected to office until September 1 of the following year or the date when the commission determines that there are insufficient funds for the public funding program;

(12) Clarifying the allotment of public funds when the funds are distributed before its is known whether the candidate will have a contested primary race;

(13) Deleting all references to "partial" public funding as a way to distinguish between the new public funding program in this bill and the existing public funding program and instead referring to the subparts in which the different funding programs are described;

(14) Amending sections 11-228 and 11-229 to include the proposed subpart;

(15) Amending the effective date to January 1, 2005 to ensure that the new public funding program will first be applied to the primary and general elections in 2006; and

(16) Making technical and possibly substantive changes too numerous to list for purposes of consistency, clarity, and style.

As affirmed by the record of votes of the members of your Committee on Judiciary that is attached to this report, your Committee is in accord with the intent and purpose of H.B. No. 2070, as amended herein, and recommends that it pass Second Reading in the form attached hereto as H.B. No. 2070, H.D. 1, and be referred to the Committee on Finance.

Respectfully submitted on behalf of the members of the Committee on Judiciary,

 

____________________________

ERIC G. HAMAKAWA, Chair