STAND. COM. REP. 1502
Honolulu, Hawaii
, 2003
RE: S.B. No. 78
S.D. 2
H.D. 1
Honorable Calvin K.Y. Say
Speaker, House of Representatives
Twenty-Second State Legislature
Regular Session of 2003
State of Hawaii
Sir:
Your Committee on Judiciary, to which was referred S.B. No. 78, S.D. 2, entitled:
"A BILL FOR AN ACT RELATING TO ELDER ABUSE,"
begs leave to report as follows:
The purpose of this bill as received is to authorize the Attorney General to seek civil penalties on behalf of the State in dependent elder abuse or neglect cases and provide for civil actions by dependent elders that may include enhanced penalties in the discretion of the court.
AARP Hawaii, Department of the Prosecuting Attorney of the City and County of Honolulu, and a concerned individual testified in support of the bill. Hawaii Long Term Care Association testified in support of the intent of the bill and opposed parts of the bill. Healthcare Association of Hawaii testified in support of the intent of the bill, opposed parts of the bill and offered amendments. The Department of the Attorney General testified in support of part of the bill and opposed other parts of the bill. A concerned individual offered comments.
Your Committee recognizes the need to provide additional remedies to deter elder abuse. However, your Committee was concerned about various aspects of the private civil remedy proposed in this bill, including the broad definition of "neglect," the standards upon which the court may impose treble damages, the absence of consideration given for the dependent elder's health care directives, and the possible impact this type of remedy will have on insurance costs for care facilities.
Your Committee has amended the bill by:
(1) Deleting the private civil remedy portion of the bill;
(2) Adding the definition of abuse from section 346-222, Hawaii Revised Statutes, amending the definition of neglect to a standard of reckless disregard for the health, safety and welfare of the dependent adult, and narrowing the examples of neglect to require knowledge of the condition of the dependent elder and consideration for the dependent elder's health care directives;
(3) Clarifying the definition of caregiver; and
(4) Making technical, nonsubstantive changes for style, consistency, and clarity.
As affirmed by the record of votes of the members of your Committee on Judiciary that is attached to this report, your Committee is in accord with the intent and purpose of S.B. No. 78, S.D. 2, as amended herein, and recommends that it pass Third Reading in the form attached hereto as S.B. No. 78, S.D. 2,
H.D. 1.
Respectfully submitted on behalf of the members of the Committee on Judiciary,
____________________________ ERIC G. HAMAKAWA, Chair |
||