CHAPTER 205A
COASTAL ZONE MANAGEMENT
Part I. Coastal Zone Management
Section
205A-1 Definitions
205A-2 Coastal zone management program; objectives and
policies
205A-3 Lead agency
205A-3.5 Public advisory body; establishment; composition
205A-4 Implementation of objectives, policies, and guidelines
205A-5 Compliance
205A-6 Cause of action
Part II. Special Management Areas
205A-21 Findings and purposes
205A-22 Definitions
205A-23 County special management area boundaries
205A-24, 25 Repealed
205A-26 Special management area guidelines
205A-27 Designation of special management area authority
205A-28 Permit required for development
205A-29 Special management area use permit procedure
205A-30 Emergency and minor permits
205A-30.5 Prohibitions
205A-31 Repealed
205A-32 Penalties
205A-33 Injunctions
Part III. Shoreline Setbacks
205A-41 Definitions
205A-42 Determination of the shoreline
205A-43 Establishment of shoreline setbacks and duties and
powers of the department
205A-43.5 Powers and duties of the authority
205A-43.6 Enforcement of shoreline setbacks
205A-44 Prohibitions
205A-45 Shoreline setback lines established by county
205A-46 Variances
205A-47 Repealed
205A-48 Conflict of other laws
205A-49 Adoption of rules
Part IV. Marine and Coastal Affairs
205A-61 Definitions
205A-62 Duties and responsibilities of the lead agency
205A-63 Agency duties to coordinate related programs
205A-64 Public participation
Part V. Other Provisions
205A-71 Artificial light on shoreline and ocean waters
Cross References
Kaho‘olawe island reserve, see chapter 6K.
Law Journals and Reviews
Native Hawaiian Cultural Practices Under Threat. I HBJ No. 13, at pg. 1.
Timesharing in the 1990s. I HBJ No. 13, at pg. 89.
Sandy Beach Defense Fund v. City and County of Honolulu: The Sufficiency of Legislative Hearings in an Administrative Setting. 12 UH L. Rev. 499.
Shoreline Setback Regulations and the Takings Analysis. 13 UH L. Rev. 1.
The Lum Court, Land Use, and the Environment: A Survey of Hawai`i Case Law 1983 to 1991. 14 UH L. Rev. 119.
Public Access Shoreline Hawaii v. Hawaii County Planning Commission: The Affirmative Duty to Consider the Effect of Development on Native Hawaiian Gathering Rights. 16 UH L. Rev. 303.
Case Notes
Existence of chapter does not preclude private right of action to force beach access. 65 H. 383, 652 P.2d 1130.
Chapter requires county planning commission to give cultural interests asserted by public interest group "full consideration" and obligates commission to "preserve and protect" native Hawaiian rights to the extent feasible when issuing SMA permits. 79 H. 425, 903 P.2d 1246.
Chapter does not apply to any development, existing or planned, for which permits listed in L 1975, c 176, §3 were issued or ordinances were passed prior to December 1, 1975. 4 H. App. 304, 666 P.2d 177.