CHAPTER 92

PUBLIC AGENCY MEETINGS AND RECORDS

 

        Part I.  Meetings

Section

     92-1 Declaration of policy and intent

   92-1.5 Administration of this part

     92-2 Definitions

   92-2.5 Permitted interactions of members

     92-3 Open meetings

   92-3.1 Limited meetings

   92-3.5 Meeting by videoconference; notice; quorum

     92-4 Executive meetings

     92-5 Exceptions

     92-6 Judicial branch, quasi-judicial boards and

          investigatory functions; applicability

     92-7 Notice

     92-8 Emergency meetings

     92-9 Minutes

    92-10 Legislative branch; applicability

    92-11 Voidability

    92-12 Enforcement

    92-13 Penalties

 

        Part II.  Boards:  Quorum; General Powers

    92-15 Boards and commissions; quorum; number of votes

          necessary to validate acts

  92-15.5 Nonattendance of board member; expiration of term

    92-16 Power of boards to issue subpoenas, administer oaths,

          appoint masters, etc.

    92-17 Consumer complaints; procedures and remedies

 

        Part III.  Copies of Records; Costs and Fees

    92-21 Copies of records; other costs and fees

   92-22, 23 Repealed

    92-24 Directors of finance and commerce and consumer

          affairs; fees

    92-25 No fees for copies of pleadings, etc.

    92-26 Fees; exemption

    92-27 Fees to be accounted for

    92-28 State service fees; increase or decrease of

    92-29 Reproduction of government records

    92-30 Copy deemed original record

    92-31 Disposition of original record

 

        Part IV.  Notice of Public Hearings

    92-41 Giving public notices

 

        Part V.  Public Records

    92-50 to 52 Repealed

 

        Part VI.  General Provisions

    92-71 Political subdivision of the State; applicability

 

Law Journals and Reviews

 

  The Lum Court, Land Use, and the Environment:  A Survey of Hawai`i Case Law 1983 to 1991.  14 UH L. Rev. 119.

 

Case Notes

 

  Rule regarding confidentiality of development proposals neither conflicted with nor contradicted "mandate" of either §92-3 or the Sunshine Law (this chapter) as a whole; plaintiff not entitled to disclosure of development proposals under those statutory provisions.  74 H. 365, 846 P.2d 882.