CHAPTER 205A

COASTAL ZONE MANAGEMENT

Part I. Coastal Zone Management

Section

205A-1 Definitions

205A-2 Coastal zone management program; objectives and

policies

205A-3 Lead agency

205A-3.5 Public advisory body; establishment; composition

205A-4 Implementation of objectives, policies, and guidelines

205A-5 Compliance

205A-6 Cause of action

Part II. Special Management Areas

205A-21 Findings and purposes

205A-22 Definitions

205A-23 County special management area boundaries

205A-24, 25 Repealed

205A-26 Special management area guidelines

205A-27 Designation of special management area authority

205A-28 Permit required for development

205A-29 Special management area use permit procedure

205A-30 Emergency and minor permits

205A-30.5 Prohibitions

205A-31 Repealed

205A-32 Penalties

205A-33 Injunctions

Part III. Shoreline Setbacks

205A-41 Definitions

205A-42 Determination of the shoreline

205A-43 Establishment of shoreline setbacks and duties and

powers of the department

205A-43.5 Powers and duties of the authority

205A-43.6 Enforcement of shoreline setbacks

205A-44 Prohibitions

205A-45 Shoreline setback lines established by county

205A-46 Variances

205A-47 Repealed

205A-48 Conflict of other laws

205A-49 Adoption of rules

Part IV. Marine and Coastal Affairs

205A-61 Definitions

205A-62 Duties and responsibilities of the lead agency

205A-63 Agency duties to coordinate related programs

205A-64 Public participation

Part V. Other Provisions

205A-71 Artificial light on shoreline and ocean waters

Cross References

Kaho‘olawe island reserve, see chapter 6K.

Law Journals and Reviews

Native Hawaiian Cultural Practices Under Threat. I HBJ No. 13, at pg. 1.

Timesharing in the 1990s. I HBJ No. 13, at pg. 89.

Sandy Beach Defense Fund v. City and County of Honolulu: The Sufficiency of Legislative Hearings in an Administrative Setting. 12 UH L. Rev. 499.

Shoreline Setback Regulations and the Takings Analysis. 13 UH L. Rev. 1.

The Lum Court, Land Use, and the Environment: A Survey of Hawai`i Case Law 1983 to 1991. 14 UH L. Rev. 119.

Public Access Shoreline Hawaii v. Hawaii County Planning Commission: The Affirmative Duty to Consider the Effect of Development on Native Hawaiian Gathering Rights. 16 UH L. Rev. 303.

Case Notes

Existence of chapter does not preclude private right of action to force beach access. 65 H. 383, 652 P.2d 1130.

Chapter requires county planning commission to give cultural interests asserted by public interest group "full consideration" and obligates commission to "preserve and protect" native Hawaiian rights to the extent feasible when issuing SMA permits. 79 H. 425, 903 P.2d 1246.

Chapter does not apply to any development, existing or planned, for which permits listed in L 1975, c 176, §3 were issued or ordinances were passed prior to December 1, 1975. 4 H. App. 304, 666 P.2d 177.

Previous Vol04_Ch0201-0257 Next