HRS 0089-0012 ANNOTATIONS

"Dispute" in subsection (a)(2) includes disputes not only with regard to initial or renewed agreement but also with regard to grievances. 54 H. 531, 511 P.2d 1080.

Subsection (c) does not require finding of irreparable harm as a prerequisite to relief for violation of subsection (a)(2). 54 H. 531, 511 P.2d 1080.

Injunctive relief under subsection (e) is available for violations of subsection (a)(2), notwithstanding the violations are also violations of contract under §89-13; applicability of chapter 380. 54 H. 531, 511 P.2d 1080.

Civil contempt for violating order enjoining strikes. 55 H. 386, 520 P.2d 422.

Strike settlement agreements are enforced in accordance with contract law. 60 H. 361, 590 P.2d 993.

Strike settlement did not have effect of condoning an illegal strike. 60 H. 361, 590 P.2d 993.

Board had authority to order union to implement the staffing of essential positions. 66 H. 461, 667 P.2d 783.

As plaintiff was designated an "essential employee", notice plaintiff received leading plaintiff to believe plaintiff could not strike was not a prohibited practice by employer. 87 H. 191, 953 P.2d 569.

Though designated as an "incumbent" employee, plaintiff was "essential employee" where plaintiff: (1) received notice by same means as essential employee; (2) was prohibited from striking; and (3) was subject to discipline for not working if scheduled to work during a strike. 87 H. 191, 953 P.2d 569.