Civil liability for shoplifting, see §663A-2.

There was material difference between this section and theft indictment. 796 F.2d 261.

Evidence of recent and exclusive possession of stolen property if unexplained will sustain finding of guilt. 62 H. 83, 611 P.2d 595.

Particular ownership of property in question not essential element in proving crime. 65 H. 217, 649 P.2d 1138.

Receiving stolen property is a continuing offense. 65 H. 261, 650 P.2d 1358.

Section merely provides an alternate but not exclusive method establishing sufficient foundation for admissibility of photographs of stolen goods in shoplifting cases. 66 H. 97, 657 P.2d 1023.

Subsection (6)(a) is not unconstitutionally vague or overbroad. 78 H. 127, 890 P.2d 1167.

Phrase "whether from the property or its proceeds or from [the person's] own property reserved in equivalent amount" in paragraph (6)(a) limits application of paragraph to one of three situations specified in paragraph. 86 H. 183 (App.), 948 P.2d 604.

In order to convict a defendant of theft in the second degree, in violation of §708-831(1)(b) and paragraph (8)(a), the prosecution must prove beyond a reasonable doubt that the accused intended to steal property or services valued in excess of $300. 90 H. 359, 978 P.2d 797.