Mentioned in discussing availability of estoppel as defense in private antitrust action. 296 F. Supp. 920.

One element of conspiracy to monopolize is specific intent to control prices or destroy competition in any line of trade or commerce. Test for specific intent is the same, whether applied to conspiracy or attempt to monopolize. 491 F. Supp. 1199.

Mere formality of separate incorporation is not, without more, sufficient to provide the capability for conspiracy. Parent corporation controlled subsidiary to such a degree that the two entities in substance constitute a single entity incapable of conspiring with itself. 513 F. Supp. 726.

Defendants lacked necessary market share and hence monopoly power in service jobbing of all tobacco products in Hawaii. 513 F. Supp. 726.

Action by shopping center tenant against shopping center owner. 530 F. Supp. 499.

Large landowner's monopoly power over own lands not illegal where not used to injure competitors. 594 F. Supp. 1480.

Elements of offense of monopoly. 63 H. 289, 627 P.2d 260.

Conspiracy to monopolize. 78-2 HLR 78-1443.